"They claim that we are somehow violating their privacy, and they are using very sleazy, lying tactics," says Camenker. He says this included the recruitment of a 17-year-old girl to their cause. "When we deposed her, we asked what had been said that was so personal. She hadn't even heard the tape. It's impossible to tell one kid's voice from another on the tape, and she didn't even know if she was on it."
Well madg, just HOW was this 17 year-old identified and added to the suit? You're carping about violations of "privacy," yet it's the homosexual organizations themselves that outed this student and violated her privacy. So you're Ok with that? As long as Camenker, Whiteman, and the PRC get slammed? Of course, it's for the homosexual "cause" and you've already told us that you're "loving every second of it."
You see, this suit has NEVER really been about "privacy." GLAD summarizes the goal of the homosexual community best, when they state on their web page:
"GLAD is putting the right-wing on notice that they cannot use intimidation tactics to try to stop vitally important sex education information from getting to young people."
That's the heart of the matter and what the homosexual community is so upset about.
So actually, we do have a identifiable victim who, at age 17, was a minor according to section 31 of Chapter 272 of M.G.L., and was exposed to material that was of a prurient nature and non-educational.