Don't.
And any ?children? that were present were teenagers? don?t try to make it sound like they were kindergarteners
They were under the age of consent. It's 15 year olds now; it'll be 6 year olds in a decade. You're not going to assert that 'Queering Elementary Education' doesn't exist, are you?
The citizens in that room were victimized by the man with a recording device and an agenda.
You betcha. Me, I don't have coversations with underage teens that I wouldn't be willing to have made public. What have they got to hide?
Oh, wait, we know the answer to that.
I don?t ?advocate? for anything that goes on between consenting adults in private. Would YOU like to control the sex lives of others? A little Texas-style ?barging into the bedroom??
Ten years go, I would have been with you on this. However, I've been ineluctably drawn to the conclusion this really isn't about privacy. It's about transforming society, including the education of children, concepts of what is and isn't public decency, and heterosexual relations, none of which has a damn thing to do with what two men do together in a bedroom. It's about getting sexual access to ever younger adolescents. It's an agenda, usually disavowed but ever more frequently being acknowledged. And, since homosexuals are increasingly invading what I consider my space, I see no particular reason why I should respect theirs.
From Tammy Bruce: Protect New York's Children from the Gay Elite
I cannot even begin to express my rage at a radical gay fringe and leftists who now are openly and willingly sacrificing children in a vain and self-obsessed drive to quench their own appetites for the young. That’s all this amounts to—adults indulging themselves, and others made too mute by political correctness to step up and say "No."