Is all this UN delay going to cause us to attack under a full moon? Is this likely to cause US casualties?
To: Neanderthal
When you least expect it...
expect it.
2 posted on
03/07/2003 9:01:22 PM PST by
error99
("I believe stupidity should hurt."...used by permission from null and void all copyrights apply...)
To: Neanderthal
With todays arms and technology I don't think it makes any difference at all.
4 posted on
03/07/2003 9:04:28 PM PST by
dalereed
To: Neanderthal
Doesn't matter when we go, we'll be unstoppable.
8 posted on
03/07/2003 9:23:31 PM PST by
Brett66
To: Neanderthal
If Bush wanted to go on the new moon, he would have gone on the new moon. The UN is just for show.
9 posted on
03/07/2003 9:27:38 PM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: Neanderthal
Night Vision technology. No moon necessary.
10 posted on
03/07/2003 9:30:48 PM PST by
BellStar
To: Neanderthal
Speaking from a military background a full moon is not the way to go at least on the ground.
We train to operate in full darkness. Moonlight actually makes it harder for us to see. You get whiteout when using NVDs and it makes you much more visable to enemy fire.
11 posted on
03/07/2003 9:31:59 PM PST by
Newbomb Turk
(Hey Newbomb, Where's your brothers ElCamino?)
To: Neanderthal
It's not gonna be a problem. Remember, the phase of the moon is irrelevant if it is up during daytime hours. Got this data right from the Alamanac on Sky and Telescopes website, so don't flame me for giving out state secrets. I joked about just this occurance with my astronomy buddies when Katie Communist was telling everyone on the Today show that we would attack on a new moon. The moon rises full but with the sun. It will be dark all night and perfect for stargazing and targeting Iraqis with thermal sites.
Basra, Iraq Mar. 17, 2003
Twilight begins: 7:36 pm
Sunrise: 8:56 pm
Sunset: 8:58 am
Twilight ends: 10:18 am
Moonrise:
7:56 am
Moonset:
9:05 pm
times are local for Basra.
To: Neanderthal
What difference does the moon phase make to 800 cruise missiles?After the first hours, it doesn't matter what they see. They will be running from it in horror
18 posted on
03/07/2003 11:45:56 PM PST by
Damagro
To: Neanderthal
Is Planet Mars visible to the naked eye these days?
23 posted on
03/08/2003 8:01:02 AM PST by
TamiPie
To: Neanderthal
Only the US is stupid enough to go to war, during a full moon, after giving the enemy 10 days notice to prepare, just to placate a bunch of socialists who hate us and want to destroy us anyway.
To: Neanderthal
Alternative theory..there isn't going to be a war.....Saddam will be deposed by several of his generals, who will then invite the US forces into the country...
27 posted on
03/08/2003 8:38:14 AM PST by
ken5050
To: Neanderthal
I was expecting our guys to go in on March 3, the dark of the new moon. Now I'm confused.
I hope the enemy is equally confused.
I do have a lot of faith in our armed forces. In Afghanistan they pacified the country in 2 months, something the full might of the Soviet Union couldn't do in 10 years.
28 posted on
03/08/2003 8:39:51 AM PST by
LibKill
(If you stare into my tag line long enough, it stares into you.)
To: Neanderthal
The CENTCOM Commander decides H-hour. It could be day/night/moon/no moon. There's a wide variety of factors to consider and numerous courses of action to take. His staff briefs him several times daily on all aspects of the operation. Whatever decision he makes will be tempered by the the best course of action that meets his intent, ensures success and mitigates risk against the enemy's most probable course of action against our forces. The staff process to get to a decision is analytical and painstaking making his decision problematic in nature.
The short answer: They will go when they go. We'll read about the whys after the fact.
32 posted on
03/08/2003 9:43:45 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson