Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A World Still Haunted by Ottoman Ghosts
nytimes.com ^ | March 9, 2003 | DAVID FROMKIN

Posted on 03/10/2003 2:29:25 PM PST by Destro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Destro
The idea that the Turkish siege of Vienna in 1683 represented a serious threat to the survival of the West is ridiculous.

By this point, the Turks were in serious decline and had fallen far behind the West in technology of all kinds, especially military. Their empire had been in serious decline for quite a few decades. The attack on Vienna was a truly classic case of imperial overstretch.

The only reason they weren't stomped on considerably earlier was because of the great religious dissension among Europeans. If they ever had represented a truly serious threat, Europe would have combined for just long enough to kick them back into the Balkans.
41 posted on 03/10/2003 10:22:58 PM PST by Restorer (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Ahh, yes, folks are still fighting the Battle of Pepperland. Watch out for those crafty, nefarious, never-to-be-trusted, implacable Snapping Turtle Turks!

And thanks to awesomebeatles.com for the lovely graphic!

These perpetual, relentless, constant jibes at Turkey are at the comic book level of analysis, and should be responded to in kind.

42 posted on 03/10/2003 11:14:44 PM PST by Mortimer Snavely (Is anyone else tired of reading these tag lines?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Destro ve eleni121 her hangi bir Türkü iyi niyet yok. Onlara bütün Türk Cumhuriyet Seytan gibi. Kandarmak olamaz.

And I hope I got that right.

43 posted on 03/10/2003 11:46:12 PM PST by Mortimer Snavely (Is anyone else tired of reading these tag lines?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Destro
If it weren't for the Brits and the Frogs, the Ottoman Empire would have gone belly-up (bankrupt)mid-19th century. This is what real foreign policy is about, it transcends religion for 'balance of power/interests (commercial or otherwise)', or because they needed the Ottoman Empire to balance against the Russian Empire, regardless of the cost to the Armenians and others under the yolke.

Support started to crumble when stories of Ottoman atrocities reached the London papers. The Brits kept the Ottoman Empire just long enough for the nascent German Empire to step in with grand projects such as the Berlin Baghdad railroad.

The much expected re-birth of Turkish influence in the immediate region in 1990 began with the export of tens of thousands of turkic script typewriters to the 'stans of the FSU. The idea became as vapid as the much expected US-German alliance that was peddled at the same time. As we have seen from current events, there is plenty to do At home and the dream has turned to joining the EU rather than becoming a major arbiter of power on the border of Europe and Asia.

VRN

44 posted on 03/11/2003 5:19:44 AM PST by Voronin (NATO is dead. Kill it properly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaron
AHHH, a Tick fan.
45 posted on 03/11/2003 5:25:56 AM PST by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro
...as it's legacy.

...as its legacy.
46 posted on 03/11/2003 5:40:33 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
Like I said the "Turkish" Jews were not loved but just used as tax cattle. But I guess when persecuted a straw bed may feel like silk.

This says it all and disappointment that much of the Turkish Jewish population had gone to Israel.

47 posted on 03/11/2003 6:17:14 AM PST by Destro (Fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"I suppose I shouldn't complain. At least this poor guy is trying."

If you have some particular expertise or insight to this I would be interested in hearing your thoughts. Specifically, I'm curious as to whether we can successfully reshape the power structure in the ME or will we just have to rely on them being afraid of us in order to keep the Terrorists at bay?
48 posted on 03/11/2003 6:26:55 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanHippy; a_Turk
Peter Hopkirk also wrote "On Secret Service East of Constantinople" - about the Turko-German plan to forment a Holy War against the Brits in India and the Russians in Central Asia.

VRN

49 posted on 03/11/2003 9:54:55 AM PST by Voronin (NATO is dead. Stuff it and mount it as proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn
I was responding to the "prayer" Destro posted. Not the original aritcle.

FYI.

50 posted on 03/11/2003 11:30:26 AM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mortimer Snavely
Hey Snavely.. could you translate that for me :o)

FRegards, Vets
51 posted on 03/11/2003 11:31:34 AM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
I was responding to the "prayer" Destro posted. Not the original aritcle.

I find the prayer of historical interest as well, but I see your point .. he could have introduced it or something as such.

52 posted on 03/11/2003 12:30:41 PM PST by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
My Turkish is pretty weak. I try to "cookbook" sentences together to show support and sympathy for the Turkish members of this forum.

What I hope I said here was: "Destro and eleni121 have no good will for any Turk. To them, the entire Turkish Republic is something like Satan. It's impossible to persuade them."

53 posted on 03/11/2003 12:38:05 PM PST by Mortimer Snavely (Is anyone else tired of reading these tag lines?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Destro
baack to the top
54 posted on 03/11/2003 2:27:09 PM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Voronin
"Peter Hopkirk also wrote..."

Thanks for the tip. Bailey's book was also on that topic but he was censored by British intelligence. I think Hopkirk went more in depth about Bailey's mission regarding the German and Austrian POW's in Central Asia that the British feared were going to stir up trouble in India. Fascinating reading! I will definately buy Hopkirk's book.

55 posted on 03/11/2003 2:27:41 PM PST by RepublicanHippy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn
I think your right. I find it of historical interest too.. but without introducing it or giving any opinion about it, it becomes that persons opinion so to speak.

The internet is a strange modem of communication because we can't see facial expressions or hear tone inflection.

All we can do is "assume" intent.

A good reminder to "explain" why we are posting something, what the source was, and give a tad more info.

FRegards, Vets
56 posted on 03/11/2003 4:26:21 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mortimer Snavely
From one who speaks NO other language, thanks for the translation. (Wish I could speak and read all languages fluently!!)
57 posted on 03/11/2003 4:27:19 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
It is evident that you two are very nice people.

But you know, there is a reason the world was divided for centuries into Christendom and Islam. Who ever wandered into the wrong neighborhood got hurt (unless he was doing business ... for which both areas of the planet had a bit of a truce going on.)

It was definitely not a nice thing to live under the Turks, who controlled the Serbs, the Bosnians, the Albanians, the larger Greek Islands, Libya, Armenia, etc. until the 19ll-1916 period when they lost a final World Series of wars which stripped them of their last Ottoman possessions, over which they were cruel and rapacious masters.

We tend to consider these conflicts today as if they were the religious or political disputes with which we are familiar here: i.e. "O Gee, should the Interfaith Picnic be at the Methodists this year, or the Baptists?"

Trust me, it couldn't have been any fun to have been a Greek, Armenian, or a Serb when the Turks came through, which they did regularly, seizing every nice-looking boy, girl, man, woman, farm animal, piece of furniture, and all the food for the winter, killing you if you had a mind to protest, or for no reason at all.

Life in Turkey itself could not have been that much better. Today's Turks have emerged from some very recent horrors to become the tough, proud and, friendly people many of us know. But don't expect any Christians from the Balkans to start a fan club soon, when there are still a few people around who remember the very bad times at their hands, first hand.

Right now, Turkey has a tough, "Go West or Go with Islam" collective decision to make. I truthfully do not think anyone from the Christian West can understand the implications, anymore. Much of Islam is at the stage Cromwell was in 500 years ago, when his men hung fellow Christians at the crossroads of Ireland with their own belts. Or when Bloody Mary's men might burn one at the stake for having a vernacular Bible. Or John Calvin was burning his heretics in the streets of Geneva.

Get an English Q'uran and set of the Hadith and read. The Islamic world has simply not moved on to be ready for life in prime time next to "Leave to Beaver" and "Everybody Loves Raymond." You can find plenty of very nice Muslims. But they belong to a very bad outfit.

No one knows that better than the western-oriented Turks who want their people and their country to be on our side of the fence.

58 posted on 03/12/2003 5:20:57 PM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
Extremely valid views. Thanks for taking the time to explain them to me. I know it is extremely complex, and we have friends who are Serbian whom we love dearly who gave us their experience and opinion during the crisis in their homeland. Their opinion mirrored what you just described to me.

We've also had the honor of meeting some wonderful Turks too. Our Serbian friends are "set" in their opinions.. very set. I guess my point is, how do they ever get past the past if they don't just "move PAST" it?

We have good relations with Japan now, and who'd a thunkit a long time ago?

Despite recent events.. we've had good relationships with Germany.

My Cherokee heritage tells me that what once looked impossible to fix, the relationship between American Indians and the Government, was indeed something we could move past and mend.

You seem extremely articulate and intelligent. What do you think could ever help the Christians and the Muslims co-exist? Especially in light of the Quran saying Muslim must never speak out against Muslim.. and Muslim must never be friends with infidels, which is all subject to interpretation when you ask scholars about the Quran..ya know? So yes, I think it is complex.. but I don't think anything is impossible. It may be naive.. but what are our choices if we can't change the hearts and minds of men?

BTW, I really like your approach. Friendly debate goes a long way. I'm open minded and won't quit learning until the day I die. I just find the attitudes of some people to be counter productive when it comes to fixing things (like the Muslim vs Christian thing). Frustrating...

I appreciate your thoughts on this subject. Thanks, Vets
59 posted on 03/12/2003 9:16:17 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
What do you think could ever help the Christians and the Muslims co-exist?

It's a harsh thing to say. But, there is no such thing as Islam. At least for Westerners who have long existed in a hierarchical, Aristotelian sort of world, a formless creed with no authority-center, is very hard to grasp. This is what is driving the so-called "Moderate" Muslims mad at this time in their history. They have or can have, absolutely no effect on the direction their "co-religionists" take. They are without authority. If any of them were, one would have long ago issued one of their famous fatwas proscribing the murder and torture of Christians, which continues from one end of the Islamic world to the other until this very hour.

The texts upon which the Muslims base their endless discussion and analysis are subject to interpretation, of course. But when Q'uran says "Kill Infidels," and 100Million or so Muslims believe that is what they are to do, of what possible use are Muslims who claim to be moderate? If Yassir Arafat in his Arabic speeches invokes the Hadith that "No Treaty with an Infidel, need be Honored," what are we to believe? There is no equivalent Pope, or Lutheran Synod, Or Southern Baptist Conference to say what a Muslim is or is not. I, or you, are just as entitled to say it as anyone else. Islam is as Muslims do. It's that simple and that complicated.

Unfortunately, IMHO the only way to co-exist, at present, with Islam is for Muslims to remain in Islamic countries. When they build their numbers in any part of the world in which they reside, they tend to demand first that they answer to only Islamic law, and then that all live under those Islamic laws as they interpret them. Many Muslims are coming to live in the United States. Of course, most of them are no trouble, and an asset to their community. However, their Q'uran actually counsels them to "lie low" until they can take over, and to lie about their intentions to their infidel neighbors. This is not exactly comforting news. Fortunately for them, most Americans are as ill-informed about Islam as they are about their own nominal creeds.

This sect is a world problem. Ataturk knew it, as all who care for the millions of good people trapped in it know it. To me, this is what makes the Turks of our era such a fascinating subject. They are on the horns of this dilemma ... and I have know idea how we might really help.

Our Judeao-Christian world came through its times of trouble and evil, but we are 37 and 7 centuries older than Islam. I hope they are not going to need that time to shape up!

60 posted on 03/12/2003 11:36:36 PM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson