Posted on 03/11/2003 3:54:00 PM PST by medscribe
Brits Backing Out?
March 11, 2003
(CBS/AP)
"What the president has said is that there is room for a little more diplomacy, but not a lot of time to do it." White House spokesman Ari Fleischer
President Bush has been working the phones ahead of a U.N. vote expected this week. (AP)
French Foreign Minister de Villepin is traveling through Africa in hopes of swinging the votes of Angola, Cameroon and Guinea to the anti-war side. (AP)
Read: • Bush Press Conference Text
• Transcript of Dan Rather/Saddam Hussein Interview
• U.S.-British 2nd Resolution Text
• French-German-Russian U.N. Memorandum Text
• Blix's Feb. 14 Progress Report
• ElBaradei's Progress Report
• E.U. Declaration On Iraq
• Text of Powell Presentation to U.N.
• Expert: Powell Presented A Strong Case
Related Features: • Message Board: Sound Off!
• President Bush's State of the Union address
• Text of U.N. Iraq Resolution
• Read Joint White House-House Resolution Authorizing Use Of Force Against Iraq (.pdf)
• Bush Speech To U.N.
Interactives: • CBS Interview With Saddam
• The Al Samoud Missile
• Showdown With Saddam
• Powell's Pitch
• The World Weighs In
• Gathering Steam
• Bios: Iraqi Leadership
(CBS) Sources tell CBS News that Great Britain – America's closest ally – may find it politically impossible to commit its military to a U.S.-led attack on Saddam Hussein. And that could force the United States to go it alone in Iraq.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld hinted as much Tuesday.
"To the extent that they are able to participate that would obviously be welcomed. To the extent they are not, well, there are workarounds," Rumsfeld said.
War in Iraq is now supported by fewer than 20 percent of Britons, and Prime Minister Tony Blair has told Washington he needs U.N. authorization, reports CBS News Correspondent Bill Plante.
So Britain is now talking about a new amendment to the draft resolution in the Security Council that would extend the March 17 deadline by as much as another ten days and would include strictly defined disarmament benchmarks – something the U.S. has opposed in the past.
"The United Kingdom is in a negotiation and it's prepared to look at timelines and tests together," Britain's U.N. Ambassador Jeremy Greenstock said. "But I'm pretty sure we're talking about action in March, don't look beyond March."
The White House said it didn't object to the tests, but made it clear that the time is limited.
"What the president has said is that there is room for a little more diplomacy, but not a lot of time to do it. The vote will take place this week," said press secretary Ari Fleischer.
The Bush administration had talked of a vote as early as Tuesday, but with France and Russia threatening to veto the current draft resolution, and without the minimum nine "yes" votes, it held up action in the council.
Diplomats from six council nations considered swing votes – Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Guinea, Mexico and Pakistan – proposed Tuesday that Saddam be given 45 days to meet benchmarks and demonstrate that Iraq is disarming.
But that appeared out of the question for the United States and Britain.
"It's not going anywhere, there's only one resolution on the table," one U.S. official said.
Under the proposed British amendment, Saddam would have 10 days to prove Iraq has taken a "strategic decision" to disarm, which could be done with a series of tests or "benchmarks," council diplomats said.
If Iraq makes that decision, a second phase would begin with more time to verify Iraq's full disarmament, the diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Reacting to the possible British compromise, French diplomats said the resolution would still mean authorizing war, which France is unwilling to do. However, the French Foreign Ministry in Paris indicated it was open to new ideas.
"It's a new development and the future will tell us if it is a significant development," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Francois Rivasseau. "We've indicated we are open to dialogue."
Nonetheless, he stressed that the "red line" set out by France cannot be crossed: "We want no ultimatum. We want no element of automaticity. And we've said we want what the inspectors say taken into account."
Russia's U.N. Ambassador Sergey Lavrov was equally adamant.
"We see no reason whatsoever to interrupt the inspections and any resolution which contains ultimatums and which contains automaticity for the use of force is not acceptable to us," he said.
The U.S. has the support of Britain, Spain and Bulgaria, with Cameroon and Mexico reportedly leaning toward the U.S. position. But with Germany, Syria and Pakistan preparing abstentions or "no" votes, Washington is trying to appeal to Chile, Angola and Guinea.
While the diplomats debate a war with Iraq, the Pentagon pressed ahead with final preparations for waging war. On Tuesday, a new weapon was added to the mix: the biggest conventional bomb ever dropped from an airplane.
It is officially designated the Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or MOAB, although it has come to be called unofficially the Mother of All Bombs, a rough allusion to Saddam Hussein's claim before the 1991 Gulf War that that conflict would be the "mother of all battles."
The Pentagon's newest and biggest weapon had to be tested before it can be used in combat. And at 21,000 pounds it promised to cause such a massive detonation that residents around the Florida bombing range had to be warned in advance.
The speed with which the Pentagon released video of the test was clearly intended as a warning to the Iraqi military of what they might face if it comes to war, reports CBS News National Security Correspondent David Martin.
"The goal is to have the capabilities of the coalition so clear and so obvious that there's an enormous disincentive for the Iraqi military to fight," Rumsfeld said.
U.S. officials say there are already secret surrender negotiations underway with the commanders of some Iraqi military units. Rumsfeld says that before the shooting starts all Iraqi units will be given one last chance to give up.
"They will receive instructions so that they can behave in a way that will be seen and understood as being non-threatening and they will not be considered combatants," Rumsfeld said.
What effect Tuesday's bomb test will have on the Iraqi will to fight remains to be seen, but the sight of a bomb so powerful that a parachute is needed to slow its descent and give the plane which dropped it time to get away from the blast can only demoralize Iraqi troops. It might also convince them to take shelter in the cities since the U.S. could never use a weapon that powerful anywhere near civilians.
In other developments:
Iraqi fighter jets threatened two American U-2 surveillance planes, forcing them to abort their mission and return to base, U.S. officials said. A Pentagon official said the decision to end the mission was made "in the interest of safety." Iraq said the U.N. had apologized for the incident and called a "technical mistake."
A spokesman for U.N. weapons inspectors says Iraq is destroying more of those banned Al Samoud Two missiles. No word on how many, though. Inspectors also visited a Baghdad factory that makes batteries and an aviation office in a northern city. Iraq, meanwhile, says any invaders would face death.
Americans are being urged to leave Oman and the United Arab Emirates. The State Department says it's due to "heightened tensions" and "increased security concerns." The military has planes stationed in both countries prepared to attack Iraq if President Bush authorizes military action.
Unlike the Frenc we don't leave Allies twisting in the wind..
What a shameless bunch of wusses the Brits have become. We should have known from their hysterical carrying on when Diana died that they had lost all their courage and backbone.
Since when do we trust anything out of CBS news.
Saddam is already building more Al Samoud missiles and exchanging old engine parts on the ones he is detroying..
About a half the public (52 per cent) agrees that Britain should join military action only if there is a new UN resolution. This compares with 62 per cent a month ago. This decline is largely because of a rise from 11 to 19 per cent in the number saying that Britain should join military action against Iraq regardless of whether there is a new UN resolution.
And:
However, Mr Blair’s leader rating has improved over the past month and he is now ahead of both the other main party leaders. This reflects increased support both from Labour and, particularly, from Tory voters.
Blair is being set up by the pollsters. And this outfit is left wing. Don't help them.
Regards, Ivan
Don't give up on Tony yet, he has done a good job standing by our side
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.