1 posted on
03/11/2003 5:36:24 PM PST by
grimalkin
To: grimalkin
Attack whenever Chirac decides to open his yap on the floor of the UN.
2 posted on
03/11/2003 5:38:35 PM PST by
byteback
To: grimalkin
some good news finally
3 posted on
03/11/2003 5:38:51 PM PST by
spokeshave
( against dead wood....as one who knows....)
To: grimalkin
There is simply no feasible way to "put off" this war for six more months. Neither is it feasible to conduct the war in the heat of summer. Therefore, tighten your seatbelts. It's about to get underway.
4 posted on
03/11/2003 5:39:09 PM PST by
SamAdams76
(California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
To: grimalkin
Yeah, sure....
To: grimalkin
give me a break.....nice thought though.
6 posted on
03/11/2003 5:42:41 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: grimalkin
March 17...March 18....30 more days...10 more days...45 more days...second resolution...two phase second resolution...one more chance...one last chance...one more last chance...just one more last chance before the next last chance...Canadian proposal...French veto...rebuffed by Turkey....no smoking gun...making great progress...willingly cooperating...very encouraged...disarm...regime change...containment...no blood for oil...not in my name...
Tellya what, will somebdy just ping me to the SADDAM OVERTHROWN, US TROOPS TAKE BAGHDAD thread when it happens. This is driving me crazy. Oh, yeah...and ping me to the ESTRADA SWORN IN thread when that one happens, too....
8 posted on
03/11/2003 5:49:11 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(It is better to be feared than to be respected.)
To: grimalkin
With the possibility of sandstorms starting to kick up in the Arabian desert towards the end of March, .......A worthy statement in a dialogue of rhetoric.
9 posted on
03/11/2003 5:50:16 PM PST by
JoeSixPack1
(POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
To: grimalkin
If the US postpones invading Iraq, it will be the "phony war" of our time.
The time is now, the time was yesterday....just as it was 12 yrs ago.
Waiting is suicide.
To: grimalkin
At this point, just how can any attack on Iraq be characterized as "early" ?
20 posted on
03/11/2003 6:32:12 PM PST by
arthurus
To: grimalkin
One can only hope so. Waiting only hurts us now. Somehow I think the Bush people have anticipated this and are ready to go. Would have been nice to have the Brits but we don't need them.
For more on why we need to do this, from an unexpected source (no friend of Bush or of conservatives), check out the Iraq section of "Frontline" at of all things PBS. More Americans should read that web page. There isn't a lot of doubt.
Woolsey puts it especially well. Alliances are for serving US national security interests -- not the other way around. Richard Butler also presents a good case.
23 posted on
03/11/2003 6:59:53 PM PST by
pttttt
To: grimalkin
bump
27 posted on
03/11/2003 7:19:04 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson