Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian PM against war without UN nod
The Tribune (Chandigarh) ^ | March 13, 2003 | Tribune News Service

Posted on 03/13/2003 1:32:05 PM PST by TBP

PM against war without UN nod Tribune News Service

New Delhi, March 12 Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee today strongly opposed any military attack against Iraq unless such an action were to have “the collective concurrence of the international community.”

Mr Vajpayee advocated for a wait and watch option to be exercised by the international community. “If permitting more time and formulation of a clearer criteria can facilitate a decision with in the UN framework, we believe this option should be given a chance.”

In an identical statement made in both the houses of Parliament on the Iraq situation, Mr Vajpayee said the work of the weapon inspectors was continuing in Iraq and “the (UN) Security Council should decide on what further action needs to be taken.”

“If unilateralism prevails, the UN would be deeply scarred with disastrous consequences for the world order. The Government of India would strongly urge that no military action be taken which does not have the collective concurrence of the international community,” Mr Vajpayee said. He felt that this could be achieved by a collective decision through the United Nations. The Prime Minister cautioned that any unilateral military action against Iraq would lead to “disastrous consequences” and strongly opposed any move to change a country’s regime by an outside force.

The Prime Minister hoped that the members of the Security Council would harmonise their positions to ensure that its final decision enhanced the legitimacy and credibility of the United Nations.

Mr Vajpayee stressed that his government had drawn up contingency plans to deal with any eventuality. The Indian nationals in Iraq numbering less than 50 had been advised to leave the country in the coming days.

Even though there was unlikely to be any large scale dislocation of the Indian communities in the neighbouring countries on a possible outbreak of hostilities, the Ministry of Civil Aviation had drawn up plans to evacuate Indians, if necessary, Mr Vajpayee said.

The Ministry of Petroleum had taken steps to shore up the inventories of crude oil. Ruling out the possibility of a major dislocation in imports of crude oil, he said India had adequate foreign exchange reserves to meet a higher crude oil import bill.

The Prime Minister pointed out that while no major dislocation in crude oil imports was envisaged, India had adequate foreign exchange reserves to meet a higher crude oil import bill if prices continue to rise in the short run.

Replying to clarifications from Opposition leaders on reports that the USA wanted to remove Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, the Prime Minister said governments should be changed by the people and established by them. “No outside force should be allowed to change a regime. Use of external force by a superpower to change a regime will be wrong and this should not be supported.”

He said peace and prosperity of the Gulf was of vital interest to India given its long standing political, cultural and economic ties with the countries of the region.

The Prime Minister said there were over 3.5 million Indians working in the Gulf “whose welfare is of great concern to us.” Their remittances were an important source of foreign exchange for the country and over 60 per cent of India’s crude oil imports.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; india; iraq; opponent; un; unitednations; war
Well, another France!

India does business with Iraq, even called them a "strategic partner." It's no wonder they've joined the French bloc to drag this out essentially forever. They know the UN will never approve; that's why they demand UN approval.

1 posted on 03/13/2003 1:32:05 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP
The u.n.--both circumcised and impotent!
2 posted on 03/13/2003 2:22:55 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
India was one of the first countries along with Israel to volunteer all their resources in the war on terror. In order not to piss off our "friends" who adhere to the religion of peace in Pakistan, GW turned both countries down. So I can't say that I'm surprised. One of these days we'll realize that we can't play good Muslim/bad Muslim. Hopefully it will be before it bites us in the ass in a serious way.
3 posted on 03/13/2003 2:59:12 PM PST by applemac_g4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: applemac_g4; swarthyguy; TBP
This would have pissed of the Indians. I am sure Tim you are clapping with feet.
4 posted on 03/13/2003 9:39:50 PM PST by akash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson