Skip to comments.
Former Congressman Calls for the U.S. to Get Out of the U.N.
Fox News ^
| myself
Posted on 03/14/2003 2:03:04 PM PST by MarcoPolo
Today on the Fox News Channel the former Congressman from Louisiana, Bob Livingston, openly stated to Shepard Smith that he feels that the United States should pull out of the United Nations. He was strong in his condemnation of the U.N. for its inaction in crises all over the world. When asked if he realized he was probably making news by making that statement he said, "I don't care." Maybe the efforts that many of us have made to get our country out of the United Nations is finally picking up some high profile supporters.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: boblivingston; usoutofun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
What do you guys think about this?
1
posted on
03/14/2003 2:03:04 PM PST
by
MarcoPolo
To: MarcoPolo
I think a former Congressman from Louisiana (didn't he resign in disgrace) has little weight in the matter.
2
posted on
03/14/2003 2:04:32 PM PST
by
Huck
To: MarcoPolo
I think this will never happen.....to many "globalists", "free-traders" (instead of fair and balanced traders) and other scum entrenched in our government to even save the US from itself.
3
posted on
03/14/2003 2:05:48 PM PST
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: MarcoPolo
Bob Livingston, openly stated to Shepard Smith that he feels that the United States should pull out of the United NationsBad choice of words for Livingston
To: MarcoPolo
Why didn't he have the courage to say this while he was still in office?
To: MarcoPolo
The only problem with the US actually leaving the UN is that we lose our veto, and will potentially have to "deal with" any crack-headed thing that the bitter French, Russians, or Chinese might try to force on us.
No, I saw we kick them out of New York, and seriously cut back funding, but stay on the Security Council.
6
posted on
03/14/2003 2:09:52 PM PST
by
smokeyjon
To: MarcoPolo
I think the UN will have a hard time replacing all of the money that the US takes with it...
To: MarcoPolo
Please get us out of this UN.
8
posted on
03/14/2003 2:11:45 PM PST
by
Digger
To: MarcoPolo
He was pretty fired up. while I agree with him, I don't know how much influence he has, but maybe his connections can keep us up to date on what is being said in the House.
9
posted on
03/14/2003 2:14:00 PM PST
by
lawgirl
(Running from the Grand Ennui)
To: MarcoPolo
Livingston was a pretty good guy. He and his aide Dave Bossie were actually out there pursuing leads during the Clinton scandals.
He was in the middle of the maelstrom, and was caught by the Clinton mud machine. A shame he left Congress, though I think he's still in DC doing lobbying.
In any case someone must start discussing the fact that the United Nations does absolutely nothing to solve real world problems (e.g. Kashimir, N. Korea, Iraq, Rwanda). This farce must be brought to public discourse, and perhaps Livingston is up to leading that kind of a political movement.
I'll say that I once worked in a "respected" multilateral organization, and every three months we'd have a one-week promenade of the worst sort of thugs and dictators you could possibly imagine, all dressed in three-piece suits, all with their palms outstretched for cash. A hall of horrors, you could see death and mayhem in their eyes.
I imagine the U.N. is no different on an ongoing basis.
10
posted on
03/14/2003 2:16:00 PM PST
by
angkor
To: Commander8
I assure you he was doing a lot while in office.
11
posted on
03/14/2003 2:16:33 PM PST
by
angkor
To: Huck
Yes...he had the decency to resign as congressman and Speaker-designate when an affair became (was made) public.
So, we should pay more attention to a lying rapist traitor impeached former president who had no similar sense of decency?
12
posted on
03/14/2003 2:17:10 PM PST
by
daler
To: smokeyjon
No, I saw we kick them out of New York, and seriously cut back funding, but stay on the Security Council.Excellent idea.
The UN being physically located in NY gives every enemy of this country a base to operate against us on our own soil, as do there embassies. In the UN our enemies are all in close contact with each other.
We can cut that problem in half by getting the UN building out of the US. - Tom
To: MarcoPolo
My fellow Americans today we are tasked with liberating Iraq from it's evil Dictator despite those who support terrorism - the liberation shall start in 5 minutes - we will deal with France and the UN after that - tonight I say to all terrorist and the nations who support them be afraid be very afraid to the God fearing freedom people of the world I say stay brave and stay free!
God bless America
To: MarcoPolo
I wrote a letter to my current Representative Virgil Goode (R-VA 5th dist.) basically stating get us out of the U.N. and get the U.N. out of the U.S.
Congressman Goode wrote me a reply letter stating that he has previously voted against funding for the U.N. and will continue to.
I have yet to hear from Senators John Warner (R-VA) and George Allen (R-VA).
15
posted on
03/14/2003 2:18:54 PM PST
by
KriegerGeist
("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
To: daler
So, we should pay more attention to a lying rapist traitor impeached former president who had no similar sense of decency? I doubt we will suffer any loss of edification by ignoring them both.
16
posted on
03/14/2003 2:19:38 PM PST
by
Huck
To: smokeyjon
This is the correct answer. Get the U.N. out of the U.S. first and maybe later get the U.S. out of the U.N.
17
posted on
03/14/2003 2:20:55 PM PST
by
Rippin
To: angkor
Livingston was a pretty good guy. He and his aide Dave Bossie were actually out there pursuing leads during the Clinton scandals.
I could be mistaken but I thought Dave Bossie worked for Congressman Dan Burton..I could be wrong though.
18
posted on
03/14/2003 2:25:16 PM PST
by
Randy Larsen
(...FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!)
To: MarcoPolo
Here's what I think (I wrote this somewhere else last year):
After we're done in Afghanistan, we should relocate all the survivors into temporary housing and then rebuild the flatland into a new modern city. This city should be named United Nations City and become the new home of the United Nations. Then the UN can relocate out of New York City and into a region that is centrally located between Europe, Asia, and Africa, in the heart of an historically troubled region.
Either do away with Afghanistan completely and divide the land amongst the bordering countries, or create a new international United Nations zone that is independent of any nation and occupies the former Afghanistan. Either way, the UN moves out of New York City.
Think of jobs for the people of Afghanistan. They can learn the construction business like Bin Laden did, or they can learn service-related skills to support the new businesses that will emerge. Bringing the UN to that region will offer a wealth of possibilities to the locals, as well as create a new "World Diplomatic Center" that is more easily accessible accessible to many people.
And as an added benefit, would Bill Clinton still want to be Secretary General if the UN were relocated to Kabul?
-PJ
To: smokeyjon
"The only problem with the US actually leaving the UN is that we lose our veto..."
We test-dropped the mother-of-all-vetoes in Florida the other day.
20
posted on
03/14/2003 2:33:16 PM PST
by
FrankR
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson