Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US battleships in Gulf pack massive punch
The Times of India ^ | March 15 2003 | AP

Posted on 03/15/2003 4:15:54 AM PST by knighthawk

ABOARD THE USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT: The US Navy battle groups now in position to strike at Iraq bristle with fighting power: long-range missiles, jets and a menacing array of cannons, Gatling guns and attack helicopters.

The five battle groups - aircraft carriers and accompanying warships - deployed in the Persian Gulf and eastern Mediterranean are a key part of the military build-up against Baghdad.

If it comes to war, much of the long-range punch brought to bear on Iraq will be launched from ships like the USS Roosevelt and its three destroyers, two cruisers and frigate.

Of the five carrier groups stationed near Iraq, the Roosevelt and the USS Harry Truman are in the eastern Mediterranean, while the USS Abraham Lincoln, the USS Kitty Hawk and the USS Constellation are in the Persian Gulf. Another carrier group, the USS Nimitz, is reportedly en route. Nuclear submarines are also close by.

As they did in the Persian Gulf War and against Afghanistan, the fleet's cruisers stand ready to fire low-flying Tomahawk cruise missiles, which can hit targets 1,110 km away.

"We can strike deep overland with Tomahawk missiles or with our tactical aircraft," said battle group commander Rear Admiral John C Harvey Jr.

If attacked, the cruisers, destroyers and even the small frigates can respond with missiles, rapid-fire cannon or attack helicopters to conventional threats much greater than Iraq is thought to be able to mount.

The USS Kitty Hawk, for example, is traveling with the cruiser USS Cowpens and the destroyer USS John S McCain, which both have the advanced Aegis radar-weapons defense system.

"We are never more than five miles away from the big boy, and we are here to protect him," said Captain Charles Dixon, skipper of the Cowpens, referring to the Kitty Hawk.

And the battle groups are ready to deploy wherever needed.

On Friday, for example, five warships attached to the Truman and Roosevelt crossed the Suez Canal after Turkey refused to grant overflight rights for US aircraft and missiles, harbour officials at Egypt's Port Said said.

"We can get moving anywhere in that vast domain of international water," Harvey said. "We can go wherever we need to go, whenever we need to go."

And wherever they go, they bring their powerful air wing. The Kitty Hawk's air wing has more than 70 planes, including the F/A-18C Hornet and the F-14 Tomcats. Both planes have a 20mm cannon and can be armed with laser-guided and regular bombs, and Sparrow and Sidewinder missiles.

Captain Mark A Vance, commander of the air wing aboard the USS Truman, says the variety of laser- and satellite-guided munitions will play a key role in any strike against Iraq.

"The precision weapons that we now carry allow us to service more than one target per aircraft. So, that has a force multiplier," he said.

"What that means is that we can fly less airplanes and do the same thing we did in Desert Storm," he said. "But I think we will fly the same amount of sorties but service more targets.'

On the Roosevelt, the thunder of F-18 jets flying daily mock combat missions attest to the state of readiness in the eastern Mediterranean and in the Gulf.

So does the mood in the "Blue Room" - the Combat Direction Centre in the bowels of the ship, where aircraft are tracked and incoming threats dealt with.

Under the dim glow of blue lights, sailors follow the action on monitors that show the position of the other ships and aircraft above. Other screens are covered with paper keeping classified information away from visitors' eyes.

A gunner sits near two control panels. One fires what the crew colloquially calls the "Seawhiz" - three six-barrelled gatling guns that fire 4,000 rounds a minute. The other controls three Sea Sparrow missile launchers.

Above deck of the $5 billion carrier, an F-18 pilot who asked to be identified only by his call sign "Heed," said his fighter-bomber - one of 48 combat aircraft on the Roosevelt, along with three attack helicopters - can "carry almost any missile and almost any bomb."

Despite the power of his fighting machine, Heed, 34, is still careful.

"You'd be foolish not to feel that knot in your stomach," in combat, he said. "Their surface-to-air missiles are older, but if they get a lucky shot, technology doesn't matter."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battleships; embeddedreport; embeddedrpt; iraq; letsroll; punch

1 posted on 03/15/2003 4:15:54 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 03/15/2003 4:16:31 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
US battleships in Gulf pack massive punch

I guess they're using the term generically.

3 posted on 03/15/2003 4:24:13 AM PST by JimVT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimVT
I wondered that myself. Perhaps they meant battlegroups.
4 posted on 03/15/2003 4:25:52 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimVT
US battleships

They don't make like the Iowa Class anymore. Didn't the New Jersey see action in the Gulf War I?

5 posted on 03/15/2003 4:30:06 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
This is not the first time the adjective "bristle" has been associated with a battleship.
6 posted on 03/15/2003 4:31:14 AM PST by SamAdams76 (California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
*snickers* I love the way they report these battle groups. Never mention the submarines capable of launching Tomahawks at periscope depth. There's usually at least one fast attack sub per carrier battle group. Sadaam is SO screwed...
7 posted on 03/15/2003 5:52:22 AM PST by Severa (Wife of Freeper Hostel, USN Active Duty Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Severa
*reads the article again, having missed the one sentence regarding subs* oops. I missed a line. *L*
8 posted on 03/15/2003 5:53:01 AM PST by Severa (Wife of Freeper Hostel, USN Active Duty Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimVT
I guess they're using the term generically.

Here I was, got all excited, and they write about a bird farm...

9 posted on 03/15/2003 6:07:52 AM PST by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/bb-61.htm

Says it was the USS Missouri (BB 63)

Also check out this link:

http://www.usswisconsin.org/General/Ships%20History.htm
10 posted on 03/15/2003 6:15:53 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

11 posted on 03/15/2003 6:21:27 AM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

12 posted on 03/15/2003 6:25:45 AM PST by Aeronaut (This project is so important, we can't let things that are more important interfere with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut
The Wisconson:


13 posted on 03/15/2003 6:31:47 AM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I build a scale model of the USS New Jersey last year (in 1/350th scale). I used a lot of etched brass and wire--it took me 4 months to build. I marvel as I look at it--amazing ship.

The reporter who wrote this could invest about $50.00 USD in Janes Fighting Ships and save himself a foot in mouth about the difference between a battleship, battle group, cruiser, etc.

14 posted on 03/15/2003 6:46:07 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
In spite of the errors, I never get tired of reading articles like this one.
15 posted on 03/15/2003 6:54:49 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I think it was the Iowa and Wisconsin


16 posted on 03/15/2003 11:07:34 AM PST by JimVT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson