Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
You don't admit a mite of confusion in that last statement?

No.
132 posted on 03/17/2003 8:01:29 PM PST by orfisher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: orfisher
Some folks ignore the sex issue -- they say, "hey a powerful man it goes with the territory."

But that's not quite true ... Frank Sinatra, notwithstanding. Sinatra was a Ladies Man and a Man's Man. I know you didn't bring up Sinatra, I did. I mean you could also include King Solomon who had 700 wives -- not up to the Wilt Chamberlain standard, but still that's a whole lot of women for a man.

Yet even if a person is in that camp (and I am not), a smart person will recognize that a Sinatra, say, would treat each and every dame with class. (Speaking to the idealized version of the Boss, but still ...)

In other words -- even a philanderer can show an example of class, of respect for his partners -- can be nice, a gentleman.

Clinton was NO genetleman. He was and is a vile man. The point is Bill Clinton treats each and dame with trash. Examples abound -- enough for a person to generalize a rule. Paula Jones -- trashed. Gennifer Flowers -- trashed. Even Monica -- trashed! "That woman" -- not even a name!

133 posted on 03/17/2003 8:17:55 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson