To: harpu
If it starts, then Ashcroft should declare martial law.
To: Semper Paratus
Are you serious?
11 posted on
03/17/2003 6:50:22 AM PST by
Sid Rich
To: Semper Paratus
If the protesters try to get close to critical military infrastructure while we are engaged in battle, they are going to get killed. The anti-war left will howl, but I think all reasonable people will agree that the military has a duty to protect critical equipment in a time of war.
No declaration of martial law is required to excersize deadly force on US military installations.
22 posted on
03/17/2003 7:22:07 AM PST by
gridlock
(This tag line printed with soy-based electrons on 100% post-cosumer ether.)
To: Semper Paratus
If it starts, then Ashcroft should declare martial law. You don't need martial law for guards at an AFB to shoot saboteurs on sight.
28 posted on
03/17/2003 8:22:51 AM PST by
Salman
To: Semper Paratus
If it starts, then Ashcroft should declare martial law. I’m more afraid of martial law than I am of some cowardly Commies.
34 posted on
03/17/2003 8:54:03 AM PST by
Barnacle
(A Happy St. Patrick’s Day to You and Yours)
To: Semper Paratus
NO NO NO NO NO
To: Semper Paratus
I read, yesterday that Vandenberg had issued orders to shoot trespassers if necessary and I guess this is the reason.
40 posted on
03/17/2003 8:59:35 AM PST by
Eva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson