[Mark Hamilton]

I'm a little confused. At first you said that the original image had a resolution of 312x475, then below that you displayed the "native" image as 200x305, which is the native image???

I gather that one should display the images in there original resolution (found under properties?).

[Fixit]

The image file that you originally linked to (in post 49) has a resolution of 312x475. If you open just that file in your browser you will see that the image is actually quite a bit larger than the 200x300 resolution that you forced it into when you posted it using the height=300 width=200 tags.

The image on the left in my post is a copy of the image you originally linked to BUT I scaled it to 200 x 305, put it on my own server, then linked to it AND the image that you posted (displayed on the right hand side of the screen.)

Sorry if this is confusing, I have a feeling that I'm not doing a good job explaining it.

The key is that in my post there are two different files linked to. The one on the right is the one you originally linked to, in the fashion that you linked to it.

The one on the right is a copy of that image that I scaled to a width of 200 and put back on the web on my own server, simply to show how much better images look at their original resolution.