Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Dead bodies are everywhere' ... Saddam's first martyrs lost
SMH.com ^ | March 22 2003 | Lindsay Murdoch

Posted on 03/21/2003 5:45:25 AM PST by veronica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: MEG33
Re: "I wish the Iraqis would adopt the French flag. Plain,no pattern,color of diapers.

Would that be with or without the single transecting brown stripe?

41 posted on 03/21/2003 8:45:20 AM PST by Uncle Jaque (MOXIE(R); It ain't for everyone, Y'know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Kozak
Crispy Critters!
43 posted on 03/21/2003 9:06:41 AM PST by nhbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veronica
When dawn broke on Safwan Hill, all that could be seen on top of it was a single antenna amid the smoke.

There's an antenna left? Heck...call in another strike...

44 posted on 03/21/2003 9:06:49 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
A legal expert at the International Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva said the use of napalm or fuel air bombs was not illegal "per se" because the US was not a signatory to the 1980 weapons convention which prohibits and restricts certain weapons. "But the US has to apply the basic principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and take all precautions to protect civilians. In the case of napalm and fuel air bombs, these are special precautions because these are area weapons, not specific weapons," said Dominique Loye, the committee's adviser on weapons and IHL.

Oh please, just STFU!!!! (not you Veronica)

45 posted on 03/21/2003 9:11:51 AM PST by wardaddy (G-dspeed our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
One of the first encounters of the ground war was more like a massacre than a fight.

-------------------------------

"I pity anybody who's in there," a marine sergeant said. "We told them to surrender."

If an armed force is fairly ordered to surrender, and refuses, then the word "massacre" has no context in the situation.

46 posted on 03/21/2003 3:41:13 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
I would have to see some kind of clear, undeniable, multiply verified proof of napalm being used before I would believe it, and such proof should be forthcoming if the stuff has indeed been revived (it's pretty hard to conceal). Murdoch is clearly a lefty of the Fisk school ("massacre" indeed!). I smell a planted myth and another conspiracy theory in the making here.
47 posted on 03/21/2003 3:55:10 PM PST by atomic conspiracy (Reformed liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi
I can think of a few tricks you can do with artillery shells -- some of which have been tested -- that would both give them a non-ballistic trajectory (messing up counterbattery calculations) and possibly improving range and/or accuracy.

On the other hand, probably the best cure for enemy counterbattery radars is a couple of ARM missiles or the like.
48 posted on 03/21/2003 7:39:38 PM PST by algol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: veronica; Kozak; Wu; Catspaw; blackdog; gunnedah; Poohbah; 2timothy3.16; Future Snake Eater; ...
The Sydney Morning Herald has been caught lying so many times - including the intentional alteration of wire service articles to change their meaning - that it should NEVER be trusted on anything.

The following was subsquented tacked onto the end of this story:

The Pentagon subsequently issued a statement to the Herald:

Your story ('Dead bodies everywhere', by Lindsay Murdoch, March 22, 2003) claiming US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false. The US took napalm out of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm. - Jeff A. Davis, Lieutenant Commander, US Navy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense.

The SMH lies. ALWAYS.
49 posted on 03/23/2003 4:52:16 PM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica; Kozak; Wu; Catspaw; blackdog; gunnedah; Poohbah; 2timothy3.16; Future Snake Eater; ...
Also:

Pentagon denies report on napalm

March 24 2003

The Pentagon has a denied a report in The Age on Saturday that napalm was used in an attack by US Navy planes on an Iraqi position at Safwan Hill in southern Iraq.

A navy official in Washington, Lieutenant-Commander Danny Hernandez, said: "We don't even have that in our arsenal." The US military says it last used napalm in 1993 and destroyed its last batch of the weapon in 2001.

The report was filed by Age correspondent Lindsay Murdoch, who is attached to units of the First US Marine Division.

Murdoch's report was based on information from two marine officers, who said napalm was used in the air strike on the hill. One of the officers repeated that napalm was used when Murdoch was asked by The Age foreign editor to confirm the story on Friday.

50 posted on 03/23/2003 4:54:13 PM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Napalm is Pablum compaired to what we have now.
51 posted on 03/23/2003 5:03:38 PM PST by oyez (This country is too good for some people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Good find!
52 posted on 03/23/2003 6:33:02 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson