Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Africa newspaper pours scorn on President Bush on war in Iraq.
Yahoo! News ^ | 03.22.03 | sraff writer

Posted on 03/21/2003 12:31:45 PM PST by yankeedame

Saturday March 22, 1:49 AM

African press vilifies Bush over Iraq war

Newspapers across Africa poured scorn on US President George Bush on over the war in Iraq.

In the South Africa, the weekly Mail and Guardian called Bush a "whore, who, more than any of his 42 predecessors, has prostituted himself to his country's industrial interests."

"What a senseless war!" Kenya's Daily Nation lamented on its leader page.

The paper warned that Bush "had embarked on a path that could make the world even more unsafe."

"One thing is sure. In many parts of the world, this will not be seen as a war against the Iraqi dictatorship; it will be seen as an assault on a people and a religion.

"That will do nothing for the cause of world peace," the editorial said.

"The recklessness of the attack on Iraq may cause the existing world order to fragment. Iraq itself may break up into two or three ethnic units corresponding to the Ottoman provinces from which it was created," said Uganda's government-run New Vision.

The newspaper lambasted the US for invading Iraq while giving "intransigent support" to Israel in the conflict with the Palestinians, saying this was "ultimately the greatest danger to the long-term security of the United States, not the fictitious threat from a tin-pot dictator."

In Morocco, La Vie Economique wrote that Osama bin Laden "arose from the rubble of the first Gulf war."

"How many more bin Ladens will come out of the ruins of the second, when Mr Bush has finished his little game?" the paper asked.

Aujourd'hui Le Maroc warned that "Bush's messianic crusade" would result in the polarisation of the world into different terrorist camps, while Maroc-Ouest newspaper concentrated on Moroccans' anger at the "intolerable injustice" of the Iraq war.

It warned of "excesses and anarchy" and "fanatical religious movements... which are simply waiting for the right moment to ruin the country."

Islamic newspaper Al Asr wondered if the United States was oblivious to the fact that the war could be seen as justifying "reactions against American interests around the world."

Under the headline "Adventurism," Liberation wrote that the United States, which has "hardly ever" heeded distress calls from people of the developing world, "has this time invited itself in, uninvited and illegally, to deliver so-called freedom to the Iraqi people, in a hail of bombs and missiles."

In Senegal, the Sud-Quotidien denounced "this illegal aggression and the possible end of international law," while Wal-fadjri said: "This war is neither legitimate nor justified, and it defies the international community."

"With this second war against Iraq and the sidelining of the UN, most of the world's nations feel threatened by 'American unilateralism'," Le Soleil newspaper wrote, envisioning a "new geopolitical configuration" after the conflict.

"The United States sees this as laying down the foundations for their enduring world supremacy, starting in a region that is situated at the crossroads of Africa, Asia and Europe, and that contains vast oil reserves," Le Soleil wrote.

All of the daily newspapers in Tunisia ploughed a similar furrow.

Le Temps warned that the war set a precedent for "law of the strongest" dominating international relations.

"Humanity ... would do well to seriously rethink the United Nations because a world without safeguards is inevitably destined for chaos," said the Quotidien.

"It is totally paradoxical that America, which portrays itself as the defender of democracy and human rights, bombs and invades Iraq in the name of these same values," Essabah wrote


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/21/2003 12:31:45 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Who cares. Everyone involved in the production of this article will be dead of AIDS in a few months anyway.
2 posted on 03/21/2003 12:32:40 PM PST by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Africa....hahahahaha.....scorning Bush......bwahahahahaha.....on war........stop, my sides are killing me.......
3 posted on 03/21/2003 12:36:29 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
"law of the strongest" -- DUH alert.

We are generous to the African nations and compassionate over the deep problems they face. That makes these editorials particularly disheartening.

The fact of the matter is we should help people because we can. But help has never brought loyalty; only knowledge, true understanding of the world can engender that.
4 posted on 03/21/2003 12:37:48 PM PST by fightinJAG ("Fine. War is frightening. It should be.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Shouldn't this be posted under Humor or Are You Kidding Me?

Shake yourself Africa - get a grip.
5 posted on 03/21/2003 12:40:06 PM PST by lodwick ( Live free or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I find your comments abhorent.

I don't care for the political opinions expressed but I, for one, care very much that millions in Africa may die of AIDS. At this point, it makes no difference what the cause is. It is a tragedy.

Human life is valuable. The death of millions, whatever the cause, should never be scoffed at.
6 posted on 03/21/2003 12:41:10 PM PST by fightinJAG ("Fine. War is frightening. It should be.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
African newspaper? My Chamber newsletter has more credibility than any African rag.
7 posted on 03/21/2003 12:52:52 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
OK I see Morrocans, Tunisians...Wait a second, these people claim to represent African opinion but I do not see any quotes from the Hottentots. How snobbish of these Africans to exclude their Hottentot comrades. How in God's name can the U.S. shape a well-balanced foreign policy, full of nuance, subtlety and old-world charm and sophistication, without the input of that key demographic?

We must stop acting unilaterally and engage in robust consultations with the Hottentots before any further adventurism! Is anybody really convinced Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, and Donald Rumsfeld are well-informed enough to go it alone? Hardly - we must be clued in by those tribesmen whose input we have previously failed to request. We can only hope they'll forgive our lack of consideration and agree to help us through the inevitable quagmire we face when the "street" erupts in the Middle East and Africa. Perhaps they will teach us the "root cause" of the world's hate for us.

8 posted on 03/21/2003 1:09:40 PM PST by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson