Skip to comments.
Iraq Deliberately Allowing Advance on Baghdad, says Iraqi Official
voa ^
| 3/23/03
Posted on 03/23/2003 10:37:23 AM PST by knak
Iraq's vice president claims Baghdad is deliberately allowing coalition forces to move toward the capital. The senior official also claims American soldiers have been captured. Iraqi officials also say there were many civilian casualties in bombing raids on the southern city of Basra.
Iraqi Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan appeared on Iraqi television, saying that captured U.S. soldiers would soon be shown on television. U.S. officials deny any coalition soldiers have been captured by the Iraqis and have shown video of hundreds of Iraqis surrendering.
Mr. Ramadan also said allied troops are moving so quickly in their desert drive north because Iraq is deliberately allowing them to move uncontested to Baghdad. He said the coalition forces would be defeated once they near the capital city.
Iraq's information minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, said 77 civilians were killed and 366 injured when, what he called cluster bombs were dropped Saturday on the southern Iraqi city of Basra. Mr. al-Sahaf accused coalition forces of targeting residential areas in Basra. There has been no independent confirmation of his claims.
Although U.S. officials have not reported the loss of any American aircraft in combat, senior Iraqi officials told reporters in Baghdad that Iraq's air defense system has shot down five coalition fighter aircraft and two helicopters.
Iraqi state-run television showed President Saddam Hussein wearing a military uniform and smiling during a meeting with his top advisers. It could not be determined when or where the video of the Iraqi president was recorded.
Earlier, coalition forces bombarded the Iraqi leader's hometown of Tikrit. In Baghdad, new explosions rocked the capital, including a blast in the center of the city and others on its outskirts.
In neighboring Syria, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri warned Turkey, another of its neighbors, against supporting a U.S.-led war against Baghdad.
Turkey is allowing U.S. aircraft to fly through Turkish airspace, but has denied a Washington request to station 62,000 U.S. troops on Turkish soil.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: roadtobaghdad; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
bs
1
posted on
03/23/2003 10:37:23 AM PST
by
knak
To: knak
What are they gonna do? Burn their crops and practice scorched Earth? God scorched that land eons ago.
2
posted on
03/23/2003 10:38:50 AM PST
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: knak
Mr. Ramadan also said allied troops are moving so quickly in their desert drive north because Iraq is deliberately allowing them to move uncontested to Baghdad. He said the coalition forces would be defeated once they near the capital city. In his dreams.
3
posted on
03/23/2003 10:39:10 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: knak
I don't know ... but I smell a trap ... it's been way too easy so far.
4
posted on
03/23/2003 10:41:26 AM PST
by
clamper1797
(Credo Quia Absurdum)
To: Bogey78O
Gen. Giap.......technique/Chinese Proverb.
5
posted on
03/23/2003 10:41:57 AM PST
by
maestro
To: knak
"Iraq's vice president claims Baghdad is deliberately allowing coalition forces to move toward the capital."
The Iraqi VP reflects a rebellious hearted statement from an arrogant loser.
6
posted on
03/23/2003 10:42:13 AM PST
by
Cvengr
To: kattracks
"I really meant to do that!' said the jihadist wanker "Pee Wee Ramadan"!
To: Bogey78O
We all know what Saddam's ghost is trying to do.....suck us into another Stalingrad in Baghdad.
I say give fair warning to the populace and level the city and all the Republican Elite Guards and their military installations within it.....NOW!
Leni
8
posted on
03/23/2003 10:42:41 AM PST
by
MinuteGal
(THIS JUST IN ! Astonishing fare reduction for FReeps Ahoy Cruise! Check it out, pronto!)
To: knak
hey Syria..... stfu
9
posted on
03/23/2003 10:43:30 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth......)
To: knak
> Iraq's vice president claims Baghdad is deliberately
> allowing coalition forces to move toward the capital.
If this were true, they'd hardly be likely to admit it.
To: MinuteGal
Us forces wouldn't have an insufferable winter to deal with. Nor wuld their logistics be slowed down. We could sit outside the city for quite a while the people surrender.
Plus the residents of Stalingrad knew what the Nazis would do if they surrendered as well as what Stalin would do. Once Baghdad falls then Saddam is gone.
11
posted on
03/23/2003 10:45:37 AM PST
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: knak
If that was their plan, they would not be announcing it.
12
posted on
03/23/2003 10:46:52 AM PST
by
MissBaby
To: knak
I have two responses:
Japan 1945, "We are allowing them to incinerate our cities so we can draw them in and suffocate them with human ashes."
Second, why the HELL haven't we taken out this stupid TV station? I don't get it.
13
posted on
03/23/2003 10:47:00 AM PST
by
LS
To: knak
"We are deliberately allowing what we are powerless to stop."

To: clamper1797
Yup. Been saying that all along. But surely our military has thought of the same.
To: knak
And when the 3rd ID crushes his "Elite" Republican Guard they'll say that was a deliberate defeat. Oh brother, these guys really are amateurs. The only thing they could do is open up with barrages of artillery filled with chemical agents. They will die quickly if that happens. If they don't use chemical weapons, they will get a chance to surrender. The whole regime doesn't seem to understand the slightest military strategy, they don't even watch the right movies that they base their strategy on. Instead of Enemy at the Gates, they should've been watching Patton. LOL!
16
posted on
03/23/2003 10:49:39 AM PST
by
Brett66
To: clamper1797
I don't know ... but I smell a trap ... it's been way too easy so far My thoughts exactly. Anyone who's ever cornered a rattlesnake knows what it does to itself when it understands it's own certain death. It bites itself injecting it's own venom. This lunatic has nothing to lose and has obviously proven he could care less about his own people. He'll martyr them in pursuit of his own glory. This madman is capable of anything at this point. The thought crossed my mind that he'll let us get close enough to Baghdad and cook one off or release some of those weapons "he doesn't have". I gotta believe the planners have thought of this scenario too, but it still lingers in the back of my mind. I pray to God I'm wrong.
To: LS
Why did Bush go on a vacation and say that he'll talk to the Pentagon about what had been happening while he was travelling back to the WH? Questions reporters should be asking.
To: knak
Well they're doing a damn good job at allowing us to advance. You know, I know naturalised Iraqi's living in America and they are simply not stupid people. Methinks, most of the smart ones have been killed or snuck out.
19
posted on
03/23/2003 10:51:34 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: MinuteGal
The Stalingrad stuff is a bunch of bs. Stalingrad was never completely encircled, as Baghdad will be. The Soviets were able to feed fresh troops into the meat grinder from the other side of the Volga.
Baathists are going to run out of meat very quickly.
20
posted on
03/23/2003 10:52:32 AM PST
by
Snake65
(Osama Bin Decomposing)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson