Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wepollock
I've read this twice and still don't understand it.
2 posted on 03/23/2003 10:00:27 PM PST by struwwelpeter (odna smert' - tragediya, milliony smertey - statistika)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: struwwelpeter
It is saying that we are too humane. Our enemies sneer at our efforts to spare civilians and civil infrastructure. We need to be willing to obliterate their cities, etc.

Of course, if we are pushed to the wall, one can imagine us losing our restraint. It is, after all, a very recent historical development after close to a century of "total war" doctrine.
5 posted on 03/23/2003 10:20:09 PM PST by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: struwwelpeter
To conquer Baghdad he thinks we need to nuke 'em glowing and shoot 'em in the dark.

Our theology has influenced our tactics, which anticipates cheering crowds when we roll into Baghdad.

Occupying a hostile Iraq may require infantry resources beyond what we have deployed, or even can deploy.

(Not even MHO, just a translation).

9 posted on 03/24/2003 3:33:21 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson