[Bogey78O]

Check this.

They cry America is pursuing an imperialistic war.

Our troops are the tools of that war.

So what does that make our troops?

Yet the libs claim to support our troops.

File that under "Populist sayings" that is if you can fit anymore under the Democrat tab.

[Stultis]

These guys are absolutely right, BUT IT'LL NEVER HAPPEN.

Why? Think of the figures that defeated communism, and triggered the greatest global expansion of democracy and freedom in modern times. Ronald Reagan, Jean Kirkpatrick, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, etc. What else do many of these giants have in common? THEY'RE FORMER DEMOCRATS.

Republicans drew off the cream of your crop decades ago, feckless fools. No serious person genuinely committed to the defense and expansion of human freedom will now join the dregs that remain.

Liberal? Progressive? Your ilk are neither, and haven't been for a generation.

[The Red Zone]

Old style liberals would buy into this. The new ones? Forget it.

[Porterville]

I can't read it; I hate liberals and everything they stand for. They suck. They deserve no respect.

[xm177e2]

And it seems to us that the only moral and practical option for liberals is to begin immediately campaigning for a more ambitious, comprehensive and compassionate reconstruction of Iraq than the one the Bush administration is likely to embrace -- while supporting the war effort that will lay the groundwork for such plans to be enacted.

Iraq has oil. It can afford its own reconstruction.

[Doomonyou]

So Ronald Reagan -- despite an agenda that was anything but moderate or mainstream --

WRONG!

RR's message was mainstream, dipwad.

[Mudcat]

"And it seems to us that the only moral and practical option for liberals is to begin immediately campaigning for a more ambitious, comprehensive and compassionate reconstruction of Iraq than the one the Bush administration is likely to embrace

Translation: tax & spend