Skip to comments.
Missiles find in chemical plant
The Scotsman ^
| March 25, 2003
| GETHIN CHAMBERLAIN AND PAUL GALLAGHER
Posted on 03/24/2003 5:36:41 PM PST by MadIvan
EXPERTS are examining suspected Scud missiles discovered by British soldiers searching a chemical plant outside Basra.
A number of the grey-painted rockets, about 23ft long, were found in the Dirhamiyah petro-chemical plant close to Iraqs second city.
The discovery has raised suspicions that Saddam Hussein was planning to arm the missiles with chemical warheads. British officers say it is difficult to find an innocent explanation for storing missiles in a chemical plant.
The find comes a day after soldiers with the Black Watch discovered a cache of weapons, including two Russian al-Harith anti-ship cruise missiles, at the Az Zubayr civilian heliport south of Basra.
The British defence company whose products were also discovered in the cache has denied selling any products to Iraq.
Wallop Defence Systems, of Middle Wallop, Hampshire, said the "weapons", described as fuses for detonators, were probably smoke grenades stolen by Iraq 13 years ago.
The issue of who supplied Iraq with weapons became increasingly heated yesterday, as Russia dismissed claims from the United States that it had illicitly supplied Saddam with arms. The US claims Russian companies sent anti-tank guided missiles, night-vision goggles and jamming devices to Iraq, in violation of United Nations sanctions.
George Bush, the US president, raised the issue with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in a phone call yesterday, according to the White House spokesman, Ari Fleischer.
But Igor Ivanov, the Russian foreign minister, said: "We did not send any goods, including military ones, that violated the sanctions."
He said that from October, the US had requested reports on the alleged illicit sales several times, and that Russia had made its most recent report on 18 March.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; bush; chemicals; illegalweapons; iraq; missiles; saddam; uk; us; war; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
If I ever see Hans Blix, I'm going to smack him very hard on the back of the head for being such an idiot.
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
03/24/2003 5:36:41 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: maui_hawaii; JenB; SJackson; TigerLikesRooster; AZLadyhawke; Southflanknorthpawsis; meema; ...
Bump!
2
posted on
03/24/2003 5:37:15 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
....smack him in the front of the head for me!! LOL!!!
3
posted on
03/24/2003 5:39:35 PM PST
by
sam_paine
To: MadIvan
Locator ^
4
posted on
03/24/2003 5:40:07 PM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
To: MadIvan
Perhaps someone could clarify, but unless the plant was operational when captured, there will be no smoking gun because I heard that chem war stuff is close to commercial chemical manufacturing.
To: MadIvan
Wallop Defence Systems, of Middle Wallop, Hampshire, said the "weapons", described as fuses for detonators, were probably smoke grenades stolen by Iraq 13 years ago.Ever the interested party in word origins....I wonder if this is where "packed a wallop" came from.
6
posted on
03/24/2003 5:41:00 PM PST
by
sam_paine
To: Dialup Llama
If there are missiles in a chemical plant, you'd have to be an idiot to not think saddam meant for them to go together.
7
posted on
03/24/2003 5:41:53 PM PST
by
Noslrac
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Dialup Llama
.. there will be no smoking gun because.......In the WAR as in the HOMELAND, there will never be a "smoking gun" satisfactory to the non-preempt crowd other than dead Americans. A rocket in a prep stage at a chem plant is EXACTLY the stage the PREEMPTION strategy is intended to catch them at!!!!
9
posted on
03/24/2003 5:43:14 PM PST
by
sam_paine
To: MadIvan
If I ever see Hans Blix, I'm going to smack him very hard on the back of the head for being such an idiot. You might ruffle a couple of his comb-over hairs! ;-))
10
posted on
03/24/2003 5:43:24 PM PST
by
spookycc
(I raq, I rack 'em up, and I roll)
To: MadIvan
British officers say it is difficult to find an innocent explanation for storing missiles in a chemical plant. I'll bet that's something Hans Blix can find.
11
posted on
03/24/2003 5:45:07 PM PST
by
merrin
To: MadIvan
Silly question, Ivan.
I keep seeing references to the Black Watch. Do the Gordon Highlanders still exist?
12
posted on
03/24/2003 5:45:35 PM PST
by
EllaMinnow
(``No Saddam Hussein!'' one young man in headscarf told Gurfein. ``Bush!'')
To: MadIvan
Uh oh.
This is only what they found.
P.S. Does this mean the French will now be on board? LOL, not holding my breath!
To: MadIvan
Look carefully to make sure you smack the right face . . . it's sometimes hard to tell with Blixie . . .
14
posted on
03/24/2003 5:46:37 PM PST
by
geedee
To: sam_paine
Apparently our inspection "regime" is working somewhat more rapidly and effectively than the UN's...
Amazing what a third of a million US, UK, and AUSSIES can do to speed up the 'result set' , eh?
To: MadIvan
Oh please smack him one for all of us, the big twit.
16
posted on
03/24/2003 5:46:53 PM PST
by
Libertina
(God Bless our Commander In Chief and our Troops!)
To: MadIvan
While your at it give him a swift kick in the ass for me,won't you?
17
posted on
03/24/2003 5:47:41 PM PST
by
semaj
To: MadIvan
Russia had made its most recent report on 18 March. I believe their technicians were still in Iraq at that point. Oh, heck, who cares about such trivial details?
18
posted on
03/24/2003 5:47:41 PM PST
by
livius
To: MadIvan
I have lost track about whether scuds have been found anywhere or not. I know the media refers to all missles as scuds so it is confusing.
Were any scuds fired or found anywhere?
To: Libertina
20
posted on
03/24/2003 5:49:34 PM PST
by
zook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson