[hollywood]

I figured you would reply in that vein. As always, your ebonics be flawless. However, I'm serious. I would like my abstract logic to be debated by the "agents of change", or in front of the Supreme Court in this case. (At the least, here on FR.) I'm sure the diversity proponents would try to deal more with feelings and cultural differences (food, music, dress, etc.), but that is not what forced diversity is all about: it's the ideas, they always say. Here is an argument against that tenet.

[hollywood]

Perhaps x can only be solved by one race, and y only by another. Maybe the diversity proponents know this, but are ashamed to admit it, as it would be the end of the equality mantra. This is not my position; it is just the other side of my logic presented above. My overall point is; prove one side or the other to maintain or eliminate forced diversity.