But Fleischer said he believed it is spread through droplets by sneezing and coughing and therefore can only be caught through very close contact with an infected person.
So how big a viral load is needed to catch this thing (and how big must the droplets be)? Do they survive on metal surfaces, and if so, for how long?
If the doctor is right and this is in the coronavirus family, then it is related to the common cold. Absent information to the contrary, it therefore seems logical to assume this has the same communicability as the common cold.
"I expect it to abate in the next few weeks," he added.
This is the most important statement in the entire article, but he gave no reasons.
So, why does he think this? Is it because he expects the "cold season" to end, thereby putting an end to SARS? That is quite possible, but I would like to hear his reason for making this statement.
Fleischer also said he believed the disease was not very contagious before a patient started to show symptoms, such as high fever and shortness of breath. Other viruses are highly contagious from the moment of infection.
Based on what I have read, this seems likely to be true. However, if he has correctly identified the family of viruses this comes from, then this is related to the common cold. It would be nice if simple souls like me could make an easy comparison. Is he saying SARS is less contagious than the common cold in its early stages? If it is equally as contagious, am I supposed to be happy?
Developing a serum against SARS could take years, Fleischer said, but he added that a new vaccination may not be necessary as known medications against viruses could help to combat it. "It first needs to be examined whether known and existing medication can help," he said.
This statement rang a lot of alarm bells. The good doctor must know that every known medication has already been tried. Nothing has been shown to be effective. There is some possibility that treatment with certain anti-virals early enough in the course of the disease may help, but this is inconclusive.
The Hong Kong research team said patients were responding well to a cocktail of anti-viral drugs and steroids.
The published information from Hong Kong as of yesterday said nothing of the kind. At best, "some" patients "may" respond, particularly if treatment is started early. Perhaps the good doctor has access to unpublished information. If so, he should let the world know.
Sorry to rain on the parade, but this article rang the bell on the BS meter. The doctor had some encouraging words, but he provided no support for his statements. The heart of his upbeat assessment was at odds with previously published information, so it was incumbent on him to support his position. He did not even attempt to do so.
I have no axe to grind, nor am I some stupid fear monger. I would like to know what is really going on. Unfortunately, this article looks more like an attempt to quell public fears than an honest attempt to disseminate information. (I admit, quelling public fear can be a good thing...)
This article had only one piece of useful information: The Germans think SARS is a new viral variant from the Coronavirus family. Based on other news today, that seems to be the emerging consensus.