Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Proof' of biological weapons found
BBC ^ | March 27th, 2003, 15:31 GMT

Posted on 03/27/2003 10:33:26 AM PST by Sabertooth

'Proof' of biological weapons found
British soldier examines gas mask
Coalition forces fear Iraq may use chemical weapons
UK troops have found evidence "categorically" proving Iraq is ready to use chemical and biological weapons, Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon says.

Mr Hoon said it had first become known from Iraqi PoWs that protective gear had been issued to troops in the south of the country.

But he said fresh evidence turned up over the last few days had proved the regime's willingness to use weapons of mass destruction.

Mr Hoon showed footage of British troops from the Royal Irish Regiment uncovering gas masks and protective suits, said to number more than 100, in a command post in the Rumaila oil field.

US and UK officials have consistently suggested that precautions against chemical and biological attacks among Iraqi soldiers are clear pointers that the regime plans to use such weapons.

Officials argue that precautions were not to counter the threat of coalition attacks, as the Iraqis would know the UK and US forces in the Gulf do not possess chemical and biological weapons.

There's an outside chance [the Iraqis] were preparing for somebody else to use weapons on their troops.
Andy Oppenheimer
Weapons expert
Mr Hoon said: "We do have evidence that the Iraqi regime is prepared to use weapons of mass destruction.

"We already knew from Iraqi prisoners of war that protective equipment was issued to southern Iraqi divisions.

"British forces have made significant discoveries in recent days which show categorically that Iraqi troops are prepared for the use of such horrific weapons.

"I want to make it clear that any Iraqi commander who sanctions the use of such weapons of mass destruction is committing a war crime and will be held personally responsible for his action."

"Paperwork and other equipment" had been found in the command post search, Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Michael Boyce said.

He added: "This kit is effective, well cared for and in good working order."

'Clearly indicative'

Mr Hoon conceded the discovery of the suits was "obviously not conclusive" proof Iraqi forces were set to use chemical or biological weapons.

But he added: "It's clearly indicative of an intention, otherwise why equip his own forces to deal with a threat which he knows we do not have?

"So it must only be to protect his forces from his own use of those weapons which we know he has."

Gas mask found in search of command post in Rumaila
A search in Rumaila turned up 100 suits
Mr Hoon said no non-lethal chemical weapons, such as CS gas, had been used in the campaign and that Britain was fully signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention which prohibited the use of such weapons in conflict.

On Tuesday US marines said they had found crates full of nuclear, biological and chemical protection suits at a hospital complex near Nasiriya which had been used by Iraqi soldiers.

Andy Oppenheimer, an expert on chemical and biological weapons with Jane's Information Group, said there could feasibly be a number of reasons for Iraq keeping suits, although Mr Hoon's interpretation was the most obvious.

He told BBC News Online: "Everybody is trying to find the smoking gun that wasn't found earlier.

"There's an outside chance [the Iraqis] were preparing for somebody else to use weapons on their troops.

"But neither the US or Britain is supposed to have any of those weapons."

But Mr Oppenheimer said the US was known to have agents that could incapacitate troops.

He added: "You could say the Iraqis want to make it look like they could use a chemical weapon. It could be part of the policy of producing as much disruption as they can."

Anti-aircraft fire

Speaking at a press briefing in the Ministry of Defence, the defence secretary also said it was possible 15 deaths in a Baghdad marketplace could have been caused by Iraqi fire.

"Although investigations continue into this tragic incident, it could clearly have been caused by fallout from the regime's anti-aircraft fire or the failure of one of the regime's own missiles," he said.

He condemned the release of footage of dead British troops and captured POWs.

"This is a flagrant and sickening breach of the Geneva Convention," he said.

"Sadly, this is typical behaviour of Saddam Hussein and his regime."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last


1 posted on 03/27/2003 10:33:26 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; mhking; ...
((((((growl)))))



2 posted on 03/27/2003 10:34:15 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
Ping
3 posted on 03/27/2003 10:35:18 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Not enough evidence for the UN and the shrieking mob.
4 posted on 03/27/2003 10:35:31 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
BBC says U.K. troops found "proof," not proof. Typical.
5 posted on 03/27/2003 10:37:49 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Duh!
6 posted on 03/27/2003 10:37:57 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of grey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Yesterday, Blixxxx dismissed this sort of news as brilliant diversionary strategy on the part of Iraq.
7 posted on 03/27/2003 10:37:59 AM PST by ErnBatavia ((bumperootus!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth

We probably won't show the evidence until *after* the war.

If we show that Iraq has them during the war, then Hussein will have less incentive left to withhold their use on our troops...

8 posted on 03/27/2003 10:38:05 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator
Mr Hoon conceded the discovery of the suits was "obviously not conclusive" proof Iraqi forces were set to use chemical or biological weapons.

But he added: "It's clearly indicative of an intention, otherwise why equip his own forces to deal with a threat which he knows we do not have?

I missed this when I posted, while I was focusing on the headline. Looks like I've been had by the BBC. Can get this out of breaking and over to Front Page? Thanks.




9 posted on 03/27/2003 10:38:10 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The proof is in the pudding. Hussein has WMD but more evidence is req'd for the rest of the world to catch up.
10 posted on 03/27/2003 10:39:07 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Hey, live by the BBC, die by the BBC.

;^)

11 posted on 03/27/2003 10:39:58 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kevao
BBC says U.K. troops found "proof," not proof. Typical.

Yep. Seem my #9. I totally fell for the headline.




12 posted on 03/27/2003 10:40:03 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Hussein has WMD but more evidence is req'd for the rest of the world to catch up.,

We won't find any before capitulation unless its used.

13 posted on 03/27/2003 10:40:34 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
The only evidence they'll accept would be dead Americans or dead Israelis. Even then, it's only a "maybe".
14 posted on 03/27/2003 10:40:55 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I think the Iraqis meant to buy ski goggles for sand storms but their order got mixed up and they got the gas masks instead. See simple explanation for it all!
15 posted on 03/27/2003 10:41:33 AM PST by AlmightySR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I think the title of the article stinks, I pressumed they had actually found the WMD's.
16 posted on 03/27/2003 10:42:53 AM PST by knak (kelly in alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"But he added: "It's clearly indicative of an intention, otherwise why equip his own forces to deal with a threat which he knows we do not have?"

He knows this?? I personally have always assumed that we do have such weapons somewhere, though I don't think we have them in the field.

I am NOT, let me repeat NOT, defending Iraq or Saddam, but exactly why would we think he would trust what we say about anything? I don't think he trusts anybody at all. And this is war.
17 posted on 03/27/2003 10:44:16 AM PST by kegler4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Did anyone see the interview Fox did this AM with one of the military. He was stating how far the Iraqi missles were going and how it was well over the 150 KM limit.
18 posted on 03/27/2003 10:44:22 AM PST by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Seems to me, though, that the allies would do themselves a large favor by not spouting off about "proof of weapons of mass destruction" when it's really not the case. It's nothing more than gas masks and chemical suits. I guess I'd just rather have them not say anything at all until they have something worth saying. Just my opinion - flame away :)
19 posted on 03/27/2003 10:45:12 AM PST by homeschool_dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Yep. Seem my #9. I totally fell for the headline.

I can see how that would happen. Tricky, aye?
I was reading and thinking "where's the proof?"
I re-read it, but it still wasn't there.
This was not fair! Not fair a'tall!

20 posted on 03/27/2003 10:45:21 AM PST by concerned about politics (Anti-American protestors are inbread liberal Notsosmartso's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson