Skip to comments.
Chemical weapons stored near Capital, captured Iraqi claims
Stars and Stripes European edition ^
| March 29, 2003
| Mark Oliva
Posted on 03/29/2003 2:00:13 PM PST by jerseygirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: jerseygirl
He claimed most of the chemical munitions are being stored closer to Baghdad. It's consistent with what we believe is true.
2
posted on
03/29/2003 2:07:42 PM PST
by
demlosers
(resetting the record)
To: jerseygirl
Doesn't surprise me. It makes perfect sense he would remove them from the southern areas where coalition forces could find them and position them closer to Baghdad. Blix himself said the other day that we should search the basements of Baghdad. Of course, he never had any intention of searching those basements during his inspections.
3
posted on
03/29/2003 2:10:23 PM PST
by
laz17
(Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
To: jerseygirl
We need to send in Hans Blix to verify this. /bs
To: jerseygirl
There is an extensive underground bunker network underlying Baghdad. The German who designed and built it said it is impenetrable. But then again, that's what we were told about Tora Bora.
When we get close enough, a few of those air sucker (I forget the real name of it) bombs can be placed at one or more of the bunker's entrance. Those bombs worked like a charm at Tora Bora.
5
posted on
03/29/2003 2:17:24 PM PST
by
randita
To: jerseygirl
There is an extensive underground bunker network underlying Baghdad. The German who designed and built it said it is impenetrable. But then again, that's what we were told about Tora Bora.
When we get close enough, a few of those air sucker (I forget the real name of it) bombs can be placed at one or more of the bunker's entrance. Those bombs worked like a charm at Tora Bora.
6
posted on
03/29/2003 2:18:10 PM PST
by
randita
To: laz17
Blix is an idiot.
To: jerseygirl
Saddam may rather level Baghdad flat or turn it into a total biohazard zone rather than let it be occupied by the US.
Kind of like, "if I can't have it, you can't have it either."
8
posted on
03/29/2003 2:21:06 PM PST
by
Sabatier
To: jerseygirl
They were ready to fight, and they will fight to the death, he added. Let's acommodate 'em.
To: Sabatier
Some posters have argued that Saddam won't use his chemicals, and have provided good reasons why he would not. Maybe I'm too pessimistic, but I do believe the RG are going to launch these weapons; i.e. "use 'em or lose 'em", when we get to a certain point and they feel overrun/threatened with loss.
To: randita
We were also told the same thing about the Atlantic Wall and the Seigfrieg Line.
11
posted on
03/29/2003 2:29:19 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(Served in Korea, Vietnam and still fighting America's enemies on Home Front)
To: randita
I dont think this Guy has any idea we have a 21000lb bunker bomb we Just tested.....
12
posted on
03/29/2003 2:29:21 PM PST
by
repub32
To: jerseygirl
If i't up to Sadam, he will use them before he's taken out, IMO. However, he has to rely on others to actually do it and, hopefully, they will decline.
13
posted on
03/29/2003 3:03:35 PM PST
by
expatpat
To: jerseygirl
?He said nothing of the chemical capabilities [near here],? Robertson said. ?He claimed most of the chemical munitions are being stored closer to Baghdad.? Sure.
14
posted on
03/29/2003 3:06:12 PM PST
by
maestro
To: randita
Do you know if the German gave us maps of the tunnels?
15
posted on
03/29/2003 3:13:10 PM PST
by
cfrels
To: randita
We havent even used our big serious bunker busting stuff yet. Not the BLU-82. Didn't we especially design some more new goodies for use in Afghanistans cave networks?
To: jerseygirl
Saddam's "red line" outside Baghdad that Coalition forces must pass before his forces use their WMD is probably where his outlying chemical weapons caches are. He'll try and use them just before we find them, not sooner or later.
17
posted on
03/29/2003 3:38:12 PM PST
by
Helvan
To: Ymani Cricket
clarification: The BLU-82 is not a bunker buster. But I haven't heard that we used it yet for shock value.
To: Helvan
I think so, too. It will be a race between us finding and destroying them, and RG launching them. How far is the red line- 25 kilometers?
To: jerseygirl; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; MadIvan; ...
20
posted on
03/29/2003 3:45:10 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Nuke Saddam and his Baby Milk Factories!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson