Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack
Part of the problem is deciphering what "they" really mean when they use various buzz-words. For example, tolerance is widely used and considered a good thing. What does that mean? My Webster's defines it as (something like) "Allowing others to hold differing beliefs without accepting those beliefs." Of course, to the modern day sophists, it has now morphed into _approval_ and outright admiration, etc.
3 posted on 03/31/2003 4:45:34 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom4US
O L-RD, who may abide in Your tent?
Who may dwell on Your holy hill?
He who walks with integrity, and works righteousness,
And speaks truth in his heart.
He does not slander with his tongue,
Nor does evil to his neighbor,
Nor takes up a reproach against his friend;
In whose eyes a reprobate is despised,
But who honors those who fear the L-RD;
He swears to his own hurt and does not change;
He does not put out his money at interest,
Nor does he take a bribe against the innocent.
He who does these things will never be shaken.
4 posted on 03/31/2003 5:04:11 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US
What people fail to realize is that "tolerance" itself is a bit of a snub. If you hold a belief, it is because you are convinced that it is correct (otherwise, you'd change your belief).

If you "tolerate" others with different beliefs, you're saying, in effect, "You're wrong, but I'll let it slide". A little patronizing, yes?

12 posted on 03/31/2003 5:55:26 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US
Part of the problem is deciphering what "they" really mean when they use various buzz-words.

A cogent point. Noam Chomsky and various other left-wingers have observed that to own the language is to own the discourse. That is why words such as "discrimination" have been so vilified. In a more genteel age, "discriminating taste" was a compliment.

This is also true of such euphemisms as "affirmative action," which is neither affirmative nor action, but simply racial prejudice with a candy coating; "partial-birth abortion," which is simply murder; and "gay rights," which is legitimization of perversion.

If the Left speaks frankly, their agenda becomes clear and people will recoil in horror. So they disguise their motives just as they disguise their intent.

17 posted on 03/31/2003 2:22:00 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson