Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatoRenasci
>>In our day, about the only reason people didn't finish in four years was the draft, pregnancy or finances

I was at Ga Tech a little after the time of your college carrer, late '70's/early 80's.

At Tech, 4 years was unusual, but it was because passing 200+ quarter hours of a difficult technical curriculum was just damned hard to do in 12 academic quarters. IIRC, most majors required around 203-206 quarter-hours, which is almost 17 hours per quarter on average. And many classes had 3-hour labs, which counted for 1 quarter hour and required substantial out-of-lab write-ups.

But your point is well taken, I don't think much of the reason for longer time-in-school to graduate today is due to academic rigor of the curricula.
26 posted on 04/01/2003 6:14:45 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster
When I was in the Army, my roomate was a Georgia Tech graduate. He did it, in some sort of engineering, in 4 years, and was the driver of the 'wreck' for two of those years. Smart guy, hard worker, could party effectively.
40 posted on 04/01/2003 6:40:07 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson