To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Silverblatt said he understands the concerns raised by fathers rights advocates, but he believes the court's first and foremost responsibility is to the child. That's a tearjerking crock designed to allow con artists to use children as human shields. That's been going on long enough. It's about time the courts re-visited this issue.
Let's have this woman introduce the kid to the real father, who can now start paying the child support. She can also explain to the kid that she hid his real father from him and lied to him all these years because she cared only about herself, and she treated both the child and the former husband as fools to be lied to for her convenience.
14 posted on
04/01/2003 7:27:08 PM PST by
Nick Danger
(More rallys planned! www.freerepublic.net)
To: Nick Danger
"Let's have this woman introduce the kid to the real father, who can now start paying the child support. She can also explain to the kid that she hid his real father from him and lied to him all these years because she cared only about herself, and she treated both the child and the former husband as fools to be lied to for her convenience.
"
While I do agree the mother was wrong to do what she did, having her spill her guts to the child would only punish the child and help ease her guilty conscience(sp?).
30 posted on
04/01/2003 7:47:27 PM PST by
honeygrl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson