To: Sweet_Sunflower29
"The presumption of paternity doctrine ... was created to prevent innocent children from bearing the stigma of illegitimacy," Silverblatt said. "What this does is open the door for the destruction of that doctrine."
I disagree, IMO it opens the door for responsible parenting and the legal and moral objective of not rewarding fraud.
To: rolling_stone
This is a big step in the right direction...for once. If you REALLY want to see a reversal of the destruction of the family, the corner stone of society, then there has to be consequences for fraud...and those consequences have to go to the party who commits it. And as far as the kids losing, they have been losing anyway by being used as tools for fraud-based extortion.
17 posted on
04/01/2003 7:33:59 PM PST by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: rolling_stone
can't the wronged man sue the biological father for repayment?
How about we just have a mandatory paternity test from the begining?
To: rolling_stone
MISSING PERSON; The child's real father. Time for that boy to write some serious checks.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson