Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US B-52s drop new cluster bombs on Iraqi tanks
Reuters | 4/02/03

Posted on 04/02/2003 5:30:23 AM PST by kattracks

US B-52s drop new cluster bombs on Iraqi tanks

WASHINGTON, April 2 (Reuters) - U.S. B-52 bombers dropped six new precision-guided 1,000-pound (454 kg) "cluster" bombs on Wednesday on an Iraqi tank column defending Baghdad, the U.S. military said.

The U.S. Central Command's air component command said the CBU-105 bombs, which each dispense a number of armor-destroying bomblets, were dropped for the first time ever "to stop an Iraqi tank column from continuing its route" toward American troops fighting the Iraqi Republican Guards.

The release did not provide any battle damage assessment of the bombing in central Iraq or say exactly where they had landed. The bombs are upgraded versions of older munitions and have been adapted to allow for wind and weather conditions to make them more accurate.

04/02/03 08:25 ET


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clusterbombs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2003 5:30:23 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think I can give you the "battle damage." DEAD.
2 posted on 04/02/2003 5:32:47 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Cool. New ordnance for a new model year.
3 posted on 04/02/2003 5:33:17 AM PST by Gefreiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I saw a vid clip on TV last night, where it looked like a whole ridge line exploded at the same time and couldn't figure out how we managed that; they then said it was cluster bombs, but I still had trouble believing it as there was no perceptible delay from one end to the other, it all seemed to happen at once. Looks like our technology is cranking...
4 posted on 04/02/2003 5:33:22 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
CBU-97/CBU-105 Sensor Fuzed Weapon
5 posted on 04/02/2003 5:34:03 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm wondering why the Iraqis still think they can move "columns" of anything without them being destroyed - whether by cluster bombs or ordinary bombs. I know they are evil, but I didn't think they were this stupid.
6 posted on 04/02/2003 5:36:00 AM PST by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
That was not a cluster bomb strike.

That was a coordinated time to target strike by artillery. The time to target is coordinated so that all the shells arrive at the same instant.

7 posted on 04/02/2003 5:36:23 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trebb
This was the one with the three guys walking from right to left at the bottom of the ridge who went flat when it hit, right?

I saw that, too. I *just missed* getting a video capture of it.
8 posted on 04/02/2003 5:36:41 AM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trebb
This munition distributes miniature anti tank devices on parachutes. They orient themselves towards armored vehicles and destroy them from above. They use the shaped charge technique and are devastating to massed armor.
9 posted on 04/02/2003 5:36:46 AM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS
I like your assessment.
10 posted on 04/02/2003 5:36:51 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Are these the "Rods of God" that I've wondered about since Jerry Pournelle described something similar in "Footfall"?
11 posted on 04/02/2003 5:37:17 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
That was a coordinated time to target strike by artillery.

I think you're right. There wasn't any of the 'crackly' fireworks effect typical of CBUs.

12 posted on 04/02/2003 5:38:28 AM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BruceS
We probably should have dropped leaflets thanking them for being so stupid as to move their armor out into the open. The equivalent of some rag-armed pitcher serving up a fifty mph chest-high fastball to Barry Bonds with the bases loaded.
13 posted on 04/02/2003 5:40:23 AM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BillM
Amazing weapon. One minute the enemy has a tank corps, the next minute he doesn't...
14 posted on 04/02/2003 5:40:24 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftless
The equivalent of some rag-armed pitcher serving up a fifty mph chest-high fastball to Barry Bonds with the bases loaded.

Yeah, when we were already up 23-0 in the bottom of the ninth... ;-)

15 posted on 04/02/2003 5:41:29 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Tom Clancy had us using these on the Chinese in 'the Bear and the Dragon'.
16 posted on 04/02/2003 5:42:50 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Here is some info and links about fuzed cluster bombs against armor. The CBU-105 is reported to being used just lately.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cbu-87.htm
17 posted on 04/02/2003 5:42:57 AM PST by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Ah, nothing like a nice Divarty 3 in Effect, Time-on-Target fired on a line off a registration point..... Ruins the perps whole day.
18 posted on 04/02/2003 5:46:05 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BOMBS AWAY FOR FREEDOM!!
19 posted on 04/02/2003 5:50:12 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey
Thanks for the link. Very interesting.

It would seem that in addition to being devastating to armor, they are specifically designed to be anti-personnel, too.

I hate to say it, but I am more concerned about reducing their personnel than I am in taking down their tanks. The Abrams that are rolling in are going to make mincemeat out of any tank they have anyhow, but after the atrocities committed by their troops, they pose a greater longterm danger, IMO.
20 posted on 04/02/2003 5:50:21 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson