Posted on 04/02/2003 8:52:35 PM PST by 2nd_Amendment_Defender
A supermarket security guard could be charged with causing the death of an armed robber who was shot in the head with his own gun during a struggle.
The 36-year-old Tesco guard, who is being treated in hospital for a bullet wound to the leg, has been arrested.
The shooting happened on Thursday morning when three men robbed a Securicor van outside a Tesco store in Leytonstone, east London. The security guard and other staff intervened, and during a scuffle a 45-year-old robber was shot in the back of the head. Witnesses said five or six shots were fired.
The robber, who wore a boiler suit and balaclava, died in hospital five hours later.
One witness said the security guard was lying wounded on the ground shouting, "Call an ambulance", while two passers-by tried to revive the robber.
The other two robbers made off in a getaway car with thousands of pounds from the security van. The car was later found abandoned. It is believed the two robbers escaped in a second vehicle.
Detectives questioned the guard, who is not thought to be seriously injured, in hospital yesterday. Neither the guard nor the robber has been identified.
A spokeswoman for Tesco said: "A Tesco security guard is helping the police with their inquiries and we will continue to co-operate fully with the police investigation."
A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said a file would be sent to the Crown Prosecution Service after all the evidence had been gathered.
It will be for the CPS to decide whether the guard acted unlawfully and if it is in the public interest to prosecute. A spokeswoman said all the circumstances of the shooting would be considered before a decision was made. The process could take some weeks.
This decision will take weeks? I would like to know what there is to decide. Who would want to live in a government with a system like this?
Sure it does. Nobody is supposed to have handguns in England, right? They were banned, weren't they? So what was this criminal doing with one?
Let's take your example one step further. Let's say the perp attacked the guard with a baseball bat. The guard, in fear for his life, snatches the bat and hits the perp over the head killing him.
Except for the nutty laws, I can't see how the guard could go to jail in either case. COMMON SENSE would dictate that he should not. Now, if the guard had his own ballbat and snuck up on the perp and popped him one, now your talking!
In England, with its gun bans, crime is so bad that supermarkets need security guards!
As much as I agree about the problems in England, you really need to read the story again and understand the difference between common usage in England vs. the US.
It is pretty clear that the "security van" was what we would call an "armored car". Even in the US armored cars have security guards, and no one remarks on how lawless we are because of it.
The real issue is that in the US the guards are armed, and if they shoot an armed robber that is very seldom a cause for a trial (although you never know in places like Chicago, NY, and Kali).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.