1 posted on
04/02/2003 11:04:38 PM PST by
sourcery
To: sourcery
To be definitively declared the cause of SARS, the novel virus must satisfy three conditions known as Koch's postulates. These were devised in 1890 by the German scientist Robert Koch, initially for anthrax infections. I don't like seeing the word anthrax attached to this story, in any way, shape or form! And no, I'm not being paranoid, just couldn't help noticing the word.
2 posted on
04/02/2003 11:12:49 PM PST by
ET(end tyranny)
(Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
To: sourcery
>>
Heymann says the virus is spread by direct contact, or large droplets of body fluids possibly deposited on surfaces. He rules out spread by tiny, aerosol droplets. "If that was the case we'd have far more cases," he told New Scientist. This sounds promissing. I get the feeling that unless you are coughed on or sneezed on, you should be able to avoid exposure with good handwashing habits. (the challenge being getting your children to do the same)
To: sourcery
5 posted on
04/02/2003 11:19:34 PM PST by
ET(end tyranny)
(Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
To: sourcery; ET(end tyranny); shadowman99; TheBigB
My biggest question for this whole outbreak is: Why couldn't they pick a better name for the disease?
Hoof and mouth disease, Legionaire's disease, Whooping Cough, and Chicken Pox, those names are cool.
But SARS?
Anyone have other suggestions?
My suggestions for the virus name:
- MIPV (Media induced panic virus)
- WHOS (World Health Organization Syndrome)
- Kofi Cough
- Peking Pneumonia
11 posted on
04/03/2003 12:06:33 AM PST by
InShanghai
(I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
To: sourcery
18 posted on
04/03/2003 7:55:15 AM PST by
B-Chan
(Ne messez pas avec le Texas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson