Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XJarhead
>Relieving a regimental commander during an assault is huge.

In the film, didn't
Patton sack a commander
for not advancing?

70 posted on 04/04/2003 7:36:20 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: theFIRMbss
In the film, didn't Patton sack a commander for not advancing?

He relieved a battalion commander, of which there were over 500 in the army as a whole. And, it was at an early stage in the war where you had to think about the best man for subsequent ops, etc. This relief is huge. There are only 9 infantry regimental commanders in the active duty Marine Corps, and not all are in Iraq. Like I said, this is really big.

79 posted on 04/04/2003 8:12:12 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: theFIRMbss
In the film, didn't Patton sack a commander for not advancing?

A large number of Army commanders at the regimental level were relieved in the Normandy fighting. A Marine Corps corps commander relieved an Army division commander in WWII.

I recall hearing that 5 out of 18 Marine Battalion commanders were relieved on Desert Storm.

Walt

154 posted on 04/04/2003 12:34:35 PM PST by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson