[bobsatwork]

"This is not new research!!! "
Sure it is. A review of existing studies is research. If they just did the review, it's new. Besides, they make a valuable point.

[KayEyeDoubleDee]

A review of existing studies is research. If they just did the review, it's new. Besides, they make a valuable point.

Well, yea, but the article makes it sound like it is some kind of new concept, not an analysis of a wealth of existing data/arguments.