To: Catspaw; dighton; Poohbah; Chancellor Palpatine; E Rocc; Illbay; Dog
If Palestinians are fighting on behalf of Saddam Hussein, then they must face the consequences.
No Palestinian State, and an American repuditation of UN Resolution 242 would be an excellent start, IMHO.
18 posted on
04/07/2003 8:10:01 AM PDT by
hchutch
("But tonight we get EVEN!" - Ice-T)
To: hchutch
Depends on what you mean. Are these guys there on order of the PLO?
Does this mean we cut off relations with Jordan?
Probably not, and no.
20 posted on
04/07/2003 8:11:54 AM PDT by
Illbay
(Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
To: hchutch
"No Palestinian State, and an American repuditation of UN Resolution 242 would be an excellent start, IMHO"
Great start. Can I add one?
Sack Arafat and run his terrorist tail up a pole while we do the things you suggested.
21 posted on
04/07/2003 8:11:54 AM PDT by
judicial meanz
(Audaces Fortuna Juvat)
To: hchutch
If Palestinians are fighting on behalf of Saddam Hussein, then they must face the consequences. No Palestinian State, and an American repuditation of UN Resolution 242 would be an excellent start, IMHO
Amen to those suggestions!
29 posted on
04/07/2003 8:15:35 AM PDT by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
To: hchutch
If Palestinians are fighting on behalf of Saddam Hussein, then they must face the consequences. No Palestinian State, and an American repuditation of UN Resolution 242 would be an excellent start, IMHO.
Only if the Palestinian Authority endorsed their mission, which I doubt.
-Eric
56 posted on
04/07/2003 8:35:03 AM PDT by
E Rocc
(Sadam Hussein is a "Muslim" like Hugo Chavez is a "Christian")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson