Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Obvioulsy the point the author of the article was making was that you can't paint an ethnicity with one giant brush. I'm on board with that statement. Why then, did he chose to paint all people that aren't rushing to Douglas, AZ. to hand out desert survival kits to people breaking in to our country as horrible people? And I personally think that when you have a movement in the southwestern United States to 'reconquista' lands that were acquired in the mid 19th century it is a perfectly valid question to ask which side you would fight on. But i am obviously just a biggoted white guy that hates everyone south of the Rio Grande

3 posted on 04/08/2003 5:10:33 AM PDT by JohnGaltSpeaking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGaltSpeaking
when you have a movement in the southwestern United States to 'reconquista' lands that were acquired in the mid 19th century [. . .]

I wish more people would pay attention to this. There are those who claim that the Southwest USA is really part of "Aztlan." (I guess what they mean is that since it is part of the ancient Aztec empire, it really belongs to Mexico).

Is it so far-fetched to suggest that such people might make common cause with groups that have, shall we say, a hostile agenda?

es


6 posted on 04/08/2003 9:15:53 AM PDT by eddiespaghetti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGaltSpeaking
a perfectly valid question to ask which side you would fight

Also when you're obtaining dual citizenship and your other president is demanding his country have "the whole enchilada" and is constantly meddling in US affairs.

10 posted on 04/08/2003 9:29:23 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson