This is the first specific info I have seen on the tests being used to "positively" identify SARS.
The tests are very slow, and tend to have false negatives. A test to quickly and reliably identify a SARS patient is urgently needed.
To: All
2 posted on
04/08/2003 12:26:15 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: EternalHope
Available tests to detect Sars not fully reliable, says WHO
Well then, no sense in using them, eh? What twerps. The same thing happened with AIDS. There was a test for Hepatitis-C, as I recall, that would usually indicate the presence of AIDS antibodies. But because it wasn't 100% accurate, various health orgs (CDC, WHO) wouldn't put *any* faith in it.
3 posted on
04/08/2003 12:30:41 PM PDT by
theDentist
(So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
To: EternalHope
Was this test developed before the WHO confirmed the identification of the SARS virus? The WHO seems now to have done that:
WHO identifies SARS virus .
To: EternalHope
FYI: I'm a middleman in the healthcare supply business. Today, I attempted to place a routine order for surgical masks. I was told by the mfg. that they were currently running 6-month backorders, minimum! I tried to ascertain just who had been buying them up but they weren't forthcoming at all.
I've been halfway expecting this. It seems to me the utility of these masks in preventing transmission is still questionable. Let's hope there isn't a pressing need for mass qtys as they may not be readily available.
12 posted on
04/08/2003 1:48:42 PM PDT by
Dysart
To: EternalHope
Available tests to detect SARS not fully reliable, says WHO WHO sez WHAT? WHY? The cat sez HE don't trust THEM!
14 posted on
04/08/2003 1:54:59 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Subvert the dominant cliche!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson