Skip to comments.
SARS Here to Stay, Health Experts Say
Reuters ^
| April 9, 2003
| Maggie Fox
Posted on 04/09/2003 4:17:14 PM PDT by EternalHope
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Yesterday Hong Kong and Singapore said SARS was probably here to stay. Today the U.S. says the same thing.
Looks like containment failed.
To: All
Free Republic Rocks, Big Time!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
04/09/2003 4:19:06 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: EternalHope
3
posted on
04/09/2003 4:23:16 PM PDT
by
riri
To: EternalHope
Were up to 154 cases in the US still in 30 states and 2722 world wide.
That is an increase of 9 or 6% since yesterday in the US and about 5% increase worldwide. Which is an improvement it's been growing about 10% a day. But that is also just one days data too.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/
4
posted on
04/09/2003 4:30:13 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: riri
Thanks for the link.
5
posted on
04/09/2003 4:33:19 PM PDT
by
EternalHope
(We will never forget what France has done.)
To: DannyTN
Thanks for the link. I bookmarked it.
The number of SARS cases in the U.S. is "suspected", rather than "probable", and even the CDC thinks it is overstated.
6
posted on
04/09/2003 4:36:59 PM PDT
by
EternalHope
(We will never forget what France has done.)
To: DannyTN; EternalHope
I wouldn't put too much faith in those numbers. Not to be a doom and gloomer but as an example Monday night we were reporting a suspected case here in the Phoenix metro area. I actually called the department of health to confirm, the official said it was a suspected case and that the patient was meeting most of the criteria for SARs. As of Wednesday, Arizona does not show on any of the lists.
I am expecting to see the cessation of the tallying of these cases as we are expected to "just deal with it"...
Another interesting note, my husbands company today was sending out a power point presentation on SARS....
7
posted on
04/09/2003 4:39:17 PM PDT
by
riri
To: riri
I am expecting to see the cessation of the tallying of these cases as we are expected to "just deal with it"... That wouldn't surprise me, I noticed that the reporting slowed down in the last three days...they had a day or more where the figures weren't updated. And even now they seem to be running a day behind.
8
posted on
04/09/2003 4:41:42 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: riri; CathyRyan; Mother Abigail; Dog Gone; Petronski; per loin; Jim Noble; InShanghai; flutters
I'm thinking of getting some kind of hand lotion that I can keep in my office so that I can wash my hands without having to leave the office (and touch doorknobs). Anybody got any recommendations?
To: aristeides
Gasoline!
10
posted on
04/09/2003 4:43:52 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(Negotiate!! .............(((Blam!.)))........... "Now who else wants to negotiate?")
To: aristeides
You can use Purell, found in drugstores, it is alcohol and supposed to kill germs, but I am not sure it would be any defense against virus.
11
posted on
04/09/2003 4:45:52 PM PDT
by
oreolady
(It's FUN to wave the flag and meet kewl people)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: oreolady
From the CDC....
All members of a household with a SARS patient should carefully follow recommendations for hand hygiene (e.g., frequent hand washing or use of alcohol-based hand rubs), particularly after contact with body fluids (e.g., respiratory secretions, urine, or feces).
Purell is an alcohol based.
To: CathyRyan
Thanks. I wonder if the CDC's failure to mention saliva and sweat is significant.
To: EternalHope
I don't like the sound of this at all!!
15
posted on
04/09/2003 5:04:49 PM PDT
by
blam
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: DannyTN
What's all this panicky talk about? A strain of pneumonia? Folks, people have been dying of "acute respiratory " diseases forever, and will continue to do so.
The timing and placement of these stories smacks of hysteria generation from our bestest buddies.
Calm down and think. There is no cure for most viral ailments, like the common cold. Should we all wet ourselves because someone sneezes in our general direction?
I read of an EO recently issued allowing forcible quarantine of people with "SARS". Since this is basically a severe cold, don't you all find this EO a tad worrisome? I find it more troubling than this flubug or whatever it is.
To: GhostofWCooper
"this is basically a severe cold,"A severe cold with a 4% death rate that kills not just the old and immune deficient.
And one that would have been largely preventable, if the WHO had been a little more panicky and put some travel restrictions in place back when it was only 150 cases.
You can "wet yourself" if you want to. However, we are staying abreast of it, and encouraging the health authorities to get control of it.
18
posted on
04/09/2003 5:19:27 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: GhostofWCooper
It's not the 4 or 5% (10% in Canada) mortality rate that is freaking me out. It is the 85% rate of people sitting in hospitals not getting any better, now that is worrying me.
19
posted on
04/09/2003 5:22:18 PM PDT
by
riri
To: DannyTN
And a 96 % life rate.
Kinda like pneumonia, plain old pneumonia.
People die. Case closed.
Let the piddling begin.. :^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson