Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Symbol blurs the U.S. mission -- US flag on statue hinted at occupation, not liberation
Newark Star Ledger ^ | April 10, 2003 | Judy Peet

Posted on 04/10/2003 7:06:53 AM PDT by Incorrigible

Symbol blurs the U.S. mission

American flag briefly on statue hinted at occupation, not liberation

Thursday, April 10, 2003
BY JUDY PEET
Star-Ledger Staff

[Newark, NJ] -- It was the defining image of the day: A crowd of exuberant Iraqis, with the help of Marines, toppling a 40-foot statue of Saddam Hussein, then dragging his giant decapitated head through the streets of Baghdad.

A classic moment of liberation imagery, however, was marred by an act of overenthusiasm by U.S. troops who put an American flag on the statue's head. That act, lasting only minutes, blurred the line between liberation and occupation and, experts said, gave proof to the astonishing power of symbols.

"Leaders are very aware of the power of the icon. It is not surprising that (Saddam) plastered his image all over Iraq," even in mosques, said Princeton professor John Darley, whose specialty is the psychology of war.

"Toppling the statue means toppling the regime, but the event is defined by who is doing the pulling," added Darley, who lectures at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.

"If the Arab world remembers the Americans and the flag, tearing down the statue becomes, not a symbol of liberation, but of occupation, and it could very well come back to haunt us."

The incident -- broadcast live across the Arab world -- started when several hundred Iraqis attacked the statue in Firdos Square in front of the Shahid Mosque. They beat it with a sledgehammer and threw a rope around its neck, but failed to bring it down.

The Marines entered the act, offering a heavy winch and cable, which they wrapped around the neck. They hung the American flag over Saddam's head, but within minutes pulled it off and replaced it with the Iraqi flag.

Initial reactions to the film clip support Darley's concerns.

"I, and many Arabs and Muslims, were appalled at the statues Saddam erected all over the country, like it was a kingdom. But what I saw on television was not liberation, it was occupation by a superior force that could turn its sights on other Arab nations at any time," said Hani Awadallah, a Montclair State University professor and president of the Arab-American Civic Organization.

"It was infuriating, even for those people who really hate Saddam," Awadallah said. "For us, that picture represents the U.S. campaign to unnecessarily destroy a city that is the capital of Islam -- where Islamic science, culture and civilization was born -- and to, in the process, antagonize 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide."

Pentagon sources said that military leaders are acutely aware of the power of statues and flags. One official said troops were warned going into Iraq not to wave the American flag, because it could be construed as "replaying Iwo Jima."

Coalition forces have been toppling, blowing up or running over Saddam's likeness ever since they got to Iraq, acts blessed by commanders as a blatant -- and very effective sign -- that the dictator is crushed.

"It is a very broad phenomenon; people see statues as a tangible image of a reality they can't control. Toppling statues allows us to personally feel in control," said Rutgers sociology professor Karen Cerulo.

She noted that the Iraqi crowd that joined in knocking down Saddam's likeness also threw shoes at it, a gross insult in the Arab world. "The connection between icon and dictator is very real."

"It happened to statues of Lenin when Russia collapsed and in China when Mao died," Cerulo added. "The difference was, the people oppressed tore down the statues, not U.S. soldiers. If that image (of Marines with their flag) is replayed over and over, it will cause a lot of damage."

Not for commercial use.  For educational and discussion purposes only.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: waaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Somebody call a WAAAAAAAAAbulance!  The New Jersey (red)Star Ledger is all upset about the US flag.
1 posted on 04/10/2003 7:06:53 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

Thanks Registered

2 posted on 04/10/2003 7:10:08 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
1) Tough

2) The Arabs already hate us, now they know we have a President who is willing and able to kick their rears.

3) I do not believe the thrill of a couple of young men, under fire for the first time, reflects US foreign policy.

3 posted on 04/10/2003 7:11:20 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (Compassionate Conservative Curmudgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Dang. You beat me to it.
4 posted on 04/10/2003 7:12:18 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
Good Grief. Expect a man to risk his life and not fly his colors--even for a moment?
5 posted on 04/10/2003 7:12:41 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Man, all the lefties know is spinspinspin! The flag in Saddam's face means exactly that: "In your face Saddam!"

It says nothing of occupation. And this author hints that we "destroyed" Baghdad. We didn't, which is kind of the point.

WAAAAAAmbulance is right!
6 posted on 04/10/2003 7:13:37 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (Time is the fire in which we burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Judy Peet: To quote Bugs Bunny, "What a ma-roon!"
7 posted on 04/10/2003 7:13:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
and lastly!! Who the hell cares? The Iraqis are free today and the only ones complaining are the losers and trash of the world who complain everytime they have to get out of bed in the morning!
8 posted on 04/10/2003 7:13:54 AM PDT by samuel_adams_us
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
These people sure can muster up a lot of garbage over a few minutes of pride.
9 posted on 04/10/2003 7:14:26 AM PDT by fml (freedom begins with W!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Gollyyyyyyyy Judy. Talk about tunnel-vision. The people of Iraq are waving American flags in the streets, and all you can see is an symbol of occupation.

Get over it. Be like Andy Rooney and have enough backbone to admit you were wrong and come to grips with the fact that that spinning like a top will not change that reality.

10 posted on 04/10/2003 7:15:10 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Every ex-pat Iraqi who was asked about this flag across the statue stated that they agreed with the marine (Cpl Chin), not with CNN....Go figger!
11 posted on 04/10/2003 7:16:40 AM PDT by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samuel_adams_us
and lastly!! Who the hell cares?

Given a little time, and some work, you may become a Curmudgeon! ;-)

12 posted on 04/10/2003 7:17:27 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (Compassionate Conservative Curmudgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
About the only good thing the Star-Ledger has going for it is Paul Mulshine.

When they throw free copies of that rag on my front lawn, I bring it inside and put it under my cat litter boxes.

13 posted on 04/10/2003 7:17:51 AM PDT by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
The man has been risking his life for the last three weeks. Even while he was putting the flag over Saddam's evil face he could have been shot at by a sniper. Naturally, some bizzy ditch has to carp about it. There's some cute words which adequately describe people like Peet - "You U.S. Wanker"
14 posted on 04/10/2003 7:18:24 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Hey, Judy, the Arab world hates our music, movies, and television, regarding them as decadent and satanic. Why don't you write a pointed column condemning the entertainment industry for offending Moslem sensibilities? Why don't you urge the entertainment industry to clean up its act, to stop exporting offensive American entertainment into countries where it is not appreciated?
15 posted on 04/10/2003 7:18:38 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
I heard on the radio this morning (don't know if it was IMUS or the local WMAL Washington DC morning show) that the soldier who had that flag had permission to carry it. It was one recovered from the WTC and the "in your face" is exactly what they wanted to portray.

At least that's the story I head this morning about the flag.
16 posted on 04/10/2003 7:19:42 AM PDT by duckbutt (God Bless America.......Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Tom Daschle is "saddened"...
17 posted on 04/10/2003 7:20:38 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
We've got to face the fact that anti-war journalists have a very long list of things to carp about, and as the mission disappoints their expections (by succeeeding) they will just move down to the next item on the list. The carping has just begun.
18 posted on 04/10/2003 7:21:09 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
There is probably a story somewhere on this, but this morning Don Wade on WLS said that this was a flag that flew over the Pentagon on 9/11. If so, sweet justice. Even if a legend, the troops had every right to do what they did. Not as occupiers, but as VICTORS.

A_R

19 posted on 04/10/2003 7:23:04 AM PDT by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
A classic moment of liberation imagery, however, was marred by an act of overenthusiasm by U.S. troops who put an American flag on the statue's head.

I guess she didn't see the same thing I did. Until the solider put up our flag, the whole thing was starting to look like an embarrasment for all there. It almost gave the impression that Saddam was indestructable. In fairness to the Iraqis, there's not much you can do with an old rope that's too short and one sledge hammer. Some Clymer wrote in another article that the crowd went quiet when he put up the American flag. His sound must have cut out because the crowd went wild when they saw it.
The Iraqi flag that came up later seems to be mostly ignored by the media.

I almost forgot. Suck on it libs. You lose.

20 posted on 04/10/2003 7:23:12 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson