Naysayers Exposed

The eternal frustration of political debate is that big, complicated issues take so long to play out that it's difficult to tell who was right and who was wrong. Not so in the war in Iraq.

Much remains unknown about the ultimate fate of the U.S. intervention: Will we find weapons of mass destruction? Manage to form a decent post-Saddam Hussein government? But we already know whether the invasion was a military disaster, and whether the Iraqis cheered our arrival. On these two counts, the level of sheer, cussed wrongness among journalists and Bush critics is stunning.

Most of them were infected with a willful pessimism, prepared to believe the worst about America's capabilities and its image among Iraqis, while puffing up the forces of Saddam. Now that reality has intruded, with a swift military victory and a warm welcome from Iraqi civilians, one wonders:

Will TV jabberer Chris Matthews admit his foolishness in writing, "This invasion of Iraq, if it goes off, will join the Bay of Pigs, Vietnam, Desert One, Beirut and Somalia in the history of military catastrophe"?

Will Barry McCaffrey, bluntly, regret his prediction that in the Battle for Baghdad, "we could take, bluntly, a couple to 3,000 casualties"?

Will Newsweek's Eleanor Clift say she's sorry for warning, "This looks more like a war of conquest than a war of liberation," or writing, "We're embroiled in a conflict that looks like a bad remake of Vietnam"? Will Newsweek be ashamed of its "down arrows" for President Bush ("His war cluelessly flings open the gates of hell, making any sort of victory Pyrrhic") and Dick Cheney ("Tells 'Meet the Press' just before war, 'We will be greeted as liberators.' An arrogant blunder for the ages.")?

Will The New York Times demand retractions from R.W. Apple ("Already [Saddam] is seen as less of an ogre and more of a defender of Islamic honor across the Arab world"), Maureen Dowd ("It was hard not to have a few acid flashbacks to Vietnam at warp speed") and Nicholas Kristoff ("Iraqis hate the United States government even more than they hate Saddam")?

Will Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen make amends for gleefully slamming "'the plan,' which the Bush administration describes as both 'brilliant' and on schedule. As anyone can see -- and as some field commanders keep saying -- it is neither"?

Will quisling journalist Peter Arnett admit not just that he exercised poor judgment, but that he was wrong when he spoke on Iraqi television of "the determination of the Iraqi forces, the determination of the government and the willingness to fight for their country"?

Will muckraker Seymour Hersh take back his suggestion that the United States was lying about the war, as he lamented that for those of us who "went through the Vietnam War, it's sort of terrifying to think it's starting already"?

Will left-wing journalist Eric Alterman apologize for asking, are Bush officials "really so ignorant of history as to believe the Iraqis would welcome us as 'their hoped-for liberators'?"

Or author Robert Wright for prognosticating, "As more civilians die and more Iraqis see their 'resistance' hailed across the Arab world as a watershed in the struggle against Western imperialism, the traditionally despised Saddam could gain appreciable support among his people"?

Or celebrity intellectual Edward Said for writing, "The idea that Iraq's population would have welcomed American forces entering the country after a terrifying aerial bombardment was always utterly implausible"?

Will actress Janeane Garofalo take out a new TV ad, correcting the impression left by her old TV ad, in which she noted, ominously, "If we invade Iraq, there's a United Nations estimate that says there will be up to a half a million people killed or wounded"?

I suspect the collective answer is, "Uh, no." As time erases the memory of their words, the naysayers will simply be willfully pessimistic about the next U.S. intervention. They will always predict "another Bay of Pigs," never "another Iraq."

Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

The naysayers even today won't acknowledge reality. One shrill pundit on NPR yesterday insisted that those cheering throngs aren't representative of Iraq. Robert Fisk called the dropping of Saddam's statue (instigated by the Iraqi people) 'staged'.

These people are just going to refuse to accept reality.

We need to continue to expose their continued fantasies and obfuscations. The other night Alan Colmes responded to criticism by changing the subject -- saying if this military has been so successful, doesn't that invalidate earlier Republican criticisms that Clinton had gutted the military. There is a response to that argument, but first and foremost he (and his ilk) have to be called to task for the lies and misttatements they made in the run-up to this war.

I watched NBC news last night. There was a camera man filming a firefight. It was amazing. The soldiers were doing their job. There was no panic just pure professionalism. I could see the enemy firing on our guys and how they kept on fighting even when wounded. I was/am totally proud of the US military.

Those who whine about the military should be totally ashamed of themselves. Our guys rule!

This is an excerpt from a John Derbyshire post on NRO's Corner:

From a reader with an email address indicating he is an employee of a large and famous software company whose name is an anagram of SNU: "Ever since 9/11 I have lamented the fact that I never joined the military and that my job (software engineering) does not contribute even remotely to the war effort. I am 28 years old, a college grad, have a wife, a house, and a child on the way, yet I feel my life is not complete. When I see our soldiers, airmen, sailors, marines, and coastguardsmen fighting for my country I regret not being one of them. Pride in the military was not fostered in my generation, we are the children of the Vietname era. As a result I was more interested in going to college, getting a job, and making money than joining the military. But over the years, as I've lived my life, I have developed a respect and pride for the military on my own. I have observed the actions of our military, in Kuwait, Iraq, Bosnia, Panama, Afghanistan, and many other places. Today I am extremely proud of our military and regret that I am not part of it. I plan to make sure that my children, and their generation know this pride from an early age, so that they can make a more informed decision than I did."

I agree very much with his sentiments.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.