Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NeonKnight
The original article quoted the marines and experts by name.

I read of lot of other articles, which claimed that this was material the UN had sealed and the marines broke the seal. But each of those articles quoted an anonymous source, NOT even an official source, who "spoke on condition of anonymity". That is supposed to refute the word of the marines and other NAMED experts quoted in the original article, that broke the story?!
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/search/s_128200.html

The following is a quote from the several later articles, trying to discredit the find.

"What happened apparently was that they broke IAEA seals, which is very unfortunate because those seals are integral to ensuring that nuclear material doesn't get diverted," the expert said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

15 posted on 04/11/2003 7:20:13 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
... the expert said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Right there is the key to the disinformation! Bill Tierney also gave ElBaradai the location where an underground atomic device was detonated, which the dufus refused to inspect, also. To allow the U.N any involvement from here on is pure folly.
18 posted on 04/11/2003 7:28:34 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson