To: Pokey78
Good grief! Early on it was apparent to me that we had some key initiatives that were going to be difficult to achieve: (1) secure the oil fields, (2) minimize damage to infrastructure e.g. bridges, (3) minimize the possibility of the use of WMD.
I believe that when we struck the first bldg where Sadam and others were expected to be, we saw a window of opportunity - if we moved quickly enough we could achieve many of these goals while the Command & Control were not in a position to respond. It appears that we were right.
The idea that anyone would look at a military operation, and think that it was in anyway significant that, for a few days, some troops were down to a meal a day, is patently absurd! THIS IS WAR!! I am guessing that at Normandy this would have been considered 5 star accomodations.
We took a brilliant, calculated risk, and the results have proved stunning. And I have yet to hear of anyone that died from starvation or lack of water.
Give me a break...
9 posted on
04/12/2003 9:25:44 PM PDT by
DougF
To: DougF
dittos on that.
11 posted on
04/12/2003 11:02:35 PM PDT by
WOSG
(All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson