To: jwalsh07
One would think that a network who thought their reporters lives were in danger for honest reporting would pull them, or at a minimum keep noting that the reporters were not free to honestly report, and that everything they said was self censored. I don't recall CNN doing that. What the hell is wrong with these people? I don't get it. It isn't about ideology, it is about honesty and decency, and hewing to reasonable standards of journalism.
107 posted on
04/14/2003 7:49:40 PM PDT by
Torie
To: Torie
I wonder if they told the "new" reporters that they sent in what they knew?
They didn't seem to mind putting THEM in danger, did they?
108 posted on
04/14/2003 7:51:53 PM PDT by
Howlin
(It's a great day to be an American -- or an Iraqi!)
To: Torie
It isn't about ideology, it is about honesty and decency, and hewing to reasonable standards of journalism.Actually, it's about all those but the driving force is ideology.
CNN has for years selected their news with leftist bias. I give you the Peter Arnett liarmentary concerning American specops using VX on our own troops.
I give you the coverage of the "election" in Iraq where CNN's reprterette actually regarde the 99.99% number as indicative of something.
I give you Christiane Amanpour and her reports from the ME biased in Iraq's favor while her boss knew of the atrocities and deception for the last decade.
And finally, I give it to you from a horses mouth. More Corruption at CNN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson