[Diddle E. Squat]

But even if one can excuse them for not reporting on the atrocities, what damns CNN is that their reporting/programming/underlying editorial bias was slanted AGAINST Bush's push for regime change. It is one thing to stay silent yet let others attempt to liberate those you know who are oppressed, and quite another to try and prevent the ending of repression.

For example, I can understand how someone living in a neighborhood terrorized by gang activity staying quiet out of fear, but there is no excuse for doing so AND actively hindering police and investigators who try to remove the gangs.

[The Old Hoosier]

But even if one can excuse them for not reporting on the atrocities, what damns CNN is that their reporting/programming/underlying editorial bias was slanted AGAINST Bush's push for regime change.

Now THAT is a fair criticism. But I don't think the "access" charge really holds water.