Posted on 04/14/2003 3:04:53 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
No love lost between Saddam, son
04/14/2003
The looted palace of Saddam Hussein's older son, Uday, reveals a heart hardened against his father.
"My father wants to go down in history, but his heart is finished from any kindness," Uday wrote in an undated letter. "I have nothing in my heart toward my father, not any love or kindness. I don't know if he listens even to himself anymore."
Looters ransacked the home in the Baghdad suburb of Karada but left ample evidence of the 39-year-old Uday's extravagance.
The remains of a steel safe, cut open with a welding torch, lie in the basement. Mixed with the gray ash are burned corners of U.S. $100 and $50 bills. "He used those to light his cigars," a neighbor said.
After committing a murder, Uday had a falling out with his father, was jailed and lost his place as the chosen successor.
That role fell to his brother, Qusay, the head of Iraq's secret police agency and the Republican Guard.
In a 1990 letter, Uday wrote that his father planned to create a greater Iraq that included Kuwait and other areas.
He also wrote to an uncle in 1990: "It is difficult being in the family of Hussein. People want to kill us."
Since a U.S. jet dropped bunker-busting bombs on a building where Saddam Hussein and his sons were believed to be meeting last week, there has been no public sign of the family.
Support Free Republic and dash their hopes! |
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
Tell him you care...LOL!
I'd rather bet that has a bit more to do with your raping young girls, beating up athletes and shooting rivals, genius.
Do you really think that someone is just holding onto anthrax for Saddam, waiting for his orders? Who could Saddam have complete trust in? Not his own son. Not Gen. al-Saadi. Not the Republican Guard generals whose military advice he rejected, condemning them to ignominious loss. There's nobody.
If Saddam did own the anthrax at one time, he no longer does. Ownership would have passed onto somebody else.
Possession is 9/10 of the law. In this case, the proportion is even higher.
I should have made clear that this presupposes that Saddam is not at large somewhere. It's possible that he's still in possession of WMD, if he's on the lam, leading a small group of people who view their survival as inextricably intertwined.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.