Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN -- The Plot Sickens!
The Washington Times ^ | 04-15-03 | cww

Posted on 04/15/2003 6:23:53 AM PDT by CWW

Corruption at CNN

Peter Collins

Mr. Eason Jordan's admission that CNN had to suppress the news from Baghdad in order to report it brought back memories for me.

In January 1993, I was in Baghdad as a reporter for CNN on a probationary, three-month contract. Previously, I had been a war reporter for CBS News in Vietnam and East Asia and in Central America for ABC News. I had also made three trips to Baghdad for ABC News before the Gulf War.

Now, Bill Clinton was about to be inaugurated and there was speculation that Saddam Hussein might "test" the new American president. Would the new administration be willing to enforce the "no-fly" zones set up in northern and southern Iraq after the Gulf War?

CNN had made its reputation during the war with its exclusive reports from Baghdad. Shortly after my arrival, I was surprised to see CNN President Tom Johnson and Eason Jordan, then chief of international news gathering, stride into the al-Rasheed Hotel in Baghdad. They were there to help CNN bid for an exclusive interview with Saddam Hussein, timed to coincide with the coming inauguration of President Clinton.

I took part in meetings between the CNN executives and various officials purported to be close to Saddam. We met with his personal translator; with a foreign affairs adviser; with Information Minister Latif Jassim; and with Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz.

In each of these meetings, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan made their pitch: Saddam Hussein would have an hour's time on CNN's worldwide network; there would be no interruptions, no commercials. I was astonished. From both the tone and the content of these conversations, it seemed to me that CNN was virtually groveling for the interview.

The day after one such meeting, I was on the roof of the Ministry of Information, preparing for my first "live shot" on CNN. A producer came up and handed me a sheet of paper with handwritten notes. "Tom Johnson wants you to read this on camera," he said. I glanced at the paper. It was an item-by-item summary of points made by Information Minister Latif Jassim in an interview that morning with Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan.

The list was so long that there was no time during the live shot to provide context. I read the information minister's points verbatim. Moments later, I was downstairs in the newsroom on the first floor of the Information Ministry. Mr. Johnson approached, having seen my performance on a TV monitor. "You were a bit flat there, Peter," he said. Again, I was astonished. The president of CNN was telling me I seemed less-than-enthusiastic reading Saddam Hussein's propaganda.

The next day, I was CNN's reporter on a trip organized by the Ministry of Information to the northern city of Mosul. "Minders" from the ministry accompanied two busloads of news people to an open, plowed field outside Mosul. The purpose was to show us that American warplanes were bombing "innocent Iraqi farmers." Bits of American ordinance were scattered on the field. One large piece was marked "CBU." I recognized it as the canister for a Cluster Bomb Unit, a weapon effective against troops in the open, or against "thin-skinned" armor. I was puzzled. Why would U.S. aircraft launch CBUs against what appeared to be an open field? Was it really to kill "innocent Iraqi farmers?" The minders showed us no victims, no witnesses. I looked around. About 2000 yards distant on a ridgeline, two radar dishes were just visible against the sky. The ground was freshly plowed. Now, I understood. The radars were probably linked to Soviet-made SA-6 surface-to-air missiles mounted on tracks, armored vehicles, parked in the field at some distance from the dishes to keep them safe. After the bombing, the Iraqis had removed the missile launchers and had plowed the field to cover the tracks.

On the way back to Baghdad, I explained to other reporters what I thought had happened, and wrote a report that was broadcast on CNN that night.

The next day, Brent Sadler, CNN's chief reporter at the time in Baghdad (he is now in northern Iraq), came up to me in a hallway of the al Rasheed Hotel. He had been pushing for the interview with Saddam and had urged Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan to come to Baghdad to help seal the deal. "Petah," he said to me in his English accent, "you know we're trying to get an interview with Saddam. That piece last night was not helpful."

So, we were supposed to shade the news to get an interview with Saddam?

As it happens, CNN never did get that interview. A few months later, I had passed my probationary period and was contemplating my future with CNN. I thought long and hard; could I be comfortable with a news organization that played those kinds of games? I decided, no, I could not, and resigned.

In my brief acquaintance with Mr. Jordan at CNN, I formed the impression of a decent man, someone with a conscience. On the day Mr. Jordan published his piece in the New York Times, a panel on Fox News was discussing his astonishing admissions. Brit Hume wondered, "Why would he ever write such a thing?" Another panelist suggested, "Perhaps his conscience is bothering him." Mr. Eason, it should be.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; cnn; easonjordan; media; news
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
CNN -- A Treasoneous News Organization. I wonder how many other reporters will come forward with similar stories?
1 posted on 04/15/2003 6:23:53 AM PDT by CWW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

"It's Time to Pony Up".


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-


2 posted on 04/15/2003 6:24:37 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
A few months later, I had passed my probationary period and was contemplating my future with CNN. I thought long and hard; could I be comfortable with a news organization that played those kinds of games? I decided, no, I could not, and resigned.

No person of integrity could.

3 posted on 04/15/2003 6:27:54 AM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
What did CNN know and when did it know it?
4 posted on 04/15/2003 6:29:08 AM PDT by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Oh the plot does "sicken".

It would be nice if this starts to make major headlines so the entire population of the USA hears about this.

5 posted on 04/15/2003 6:31:10 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
"I am at peace with myself knowing that I did the right thing..."

6 posted on 04/15/2003 6:34:48 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lsee
"No person of integrity could."

What does that say about those who did not resign?

7 posted on 04/15/2003 6:36:11 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Why would U.S. aircraft launch CBUs against what appeared to be an open field? Was it really to kill "innocent Iraqi farmers?" The minders showed us no victims, no witnesses. I looked around.

I have read about Iraq's propaganda game where they would only grant press access in exchange for a number of stories on the "oppressive" conditions that the oil-for-food program forced on Iraqi civilians.

"The game" that has been played is absolutely revolting; I hope that CNN (with the most mis-information) will crash and burn for their deal with the devil.

8 posted on 04/15/2003 6:37:58 AM PDT by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
Can any rational human believe Turner OR CNN? Absolutely NOT.
They are compelled to destroy justice, liberty, and the American way.




NEW CNN TELEVISION SERIES

The New Destruction of Western Civilization by, and on, CNN

==========================

Monday:

A program on 'Our Planned Future Complete Destruction of all Traces of Israel'
narrated by Sheila MacVicar, Andrea Koppel and Terrorist Arafat.


Tuesday:

How the USA lost in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Wednesday:

Ms. Fonda Turner returns for 'Our Past and Future Treason against America'


THURSDAY:
Ted Turner will tell of his being "a student at Brown University
...kicked out for painting swastikas on the doors of Jewish student's rooms."
Turner will give an intro into turning Hate Crime,
like his, into paying off with billions and billions of $$$$$$$$.

Ted Turner, June 18, 2002: "So who are the terrorists?
I would make a case that both sides are involved in terrorism.
"


FRIDAY:
Ted Turner lists the 50 compelling reasons that
CNN sponsors, highlights, and supports Palestinian murderers.
CNN will continue to focus on the murderers calling the despicable terrorists "suicide bombers".


CNN argues that all murder and terrorism against Americans and Jews
is not really terrorism but is just a "CNN-reasonable alternative".


SATURDAY:
Ted Turner lists how he and his lawyers scr$#ed
"the descendants of 47 black residents who pooled their money in 1920 to
purchase a 328-acre plantation"
CNN harbors terrorists. It always has been, and apparently always will be.

9 posted on 04/15/2003 6:38:36 AM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
I wonder how many of those other news organizations have done the same?
10 posted on 04/15/2003 6:38:49 AM PDT by DeuceTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
I couldn't resist emailing CNN on this one. =) I have followed recent story reported by Eason Jordan regarding the "sanitization" of reporting by CNN out of the Baghdad office with some interest. At first, I was inclined to accept CNN's official statement that being careful about coverage of Saddam Hussein's regime was in the interest of safety, particularly for journalists on location. In the Washington Times, however, I had the opportunity to read a column by Peter Collins who claims to have worked for CNN under a probationary contract shortly after Bill Clinton was elected president. His story has completely changed my mind, and I now find CNN's "explanation" of this policy to be wholly inadequate and contrived. I will no longer patronize CNN for news of any kind. In light of the seriousness of this breach of journalistic integrity, I am sending a copy of Mr. Collins' column to all of my associates with the suggestion that they also may find a more concientious source of news elsewhere. Shame on you, CNN. Heh-heh.
11 posted on 04/15/2003 6:39:22 AM PDT by Retrofire (Let's roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
CENSORED NEWS NETWORK

12 posted on 04/15/2003 6:39:43 AM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
the most abusive, anti-US news channel i have ever seen is CNN En Espanol.

not very many ads on CNN En Espanol, only Peugeot and -- Amway! how can we boycott them, eh Freepers? is Amway leftist run?

It is 24/7 socialist B***S*** and unfortunately is the only "live" news channel on cable we get (thank heaven for there is broadband in Chile and i can get live video off the net!)

13 posted on 04/15/2003 6:41:00 AM PDT by chilepepper (Gnocchi Seuton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWW
During Vietnam, the US got a lot of flak when Peter Arnett published the quote, "We had to destroy the village, in order to save it." But CNN is now saying, "We had to suppress the news, in order to report it."
14 posted on 04/15/2003 6:41:41 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: CWW
Collaborator News Network has just about hit bottom...

or can they go lower?

16 posted on 04/15/2003 6:44:59 AM PDT by syriacus (Schumer says a RED flag has been raised on Estrada. Straw man or RED Herring are more correct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tractorman
"What did CNN know and when did it know it?"


Follows is an e-mail I sent Hugh Hewett-


Hugh, with the revelations that CNN knew of certain bad deeds by Saddam and company for years. And with the knowledge that CNN also enjoys the nickname of Clinton News Network, one can but wonder just what Clinton knew and when did he know it.

For example, did CNN have a heads up on the Cole?
Did CNN have a heads up on 9-11. What did they know and when did they tell Bill?

I can only believe that Billy Jeff has had knowledge of all of these incidents and chose to keep his mouth shut for purely political purposes.

Treason from Arnett? Maybe. Treason by WJC? I would bet on it.
17 posted on 04/15/2003 6:55:04 AM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BartMan1
I wish someone would explain to me the difference between Baghdad Bob and Mike McCurry, and CNN's coverage of Iraq vs. CNN's coverage of the Clinton White House

18 posted on 04/15/2003 6:59:54 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop
I hope that CNN (with the most mis-information) will crash and burn for their deal with the devil.

I hope so too. But they won't. They'll get a pass. Just watch, you'll see.

19 posted on 04/15/2003 7:00:13 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: YWNman
What Jordan did was awful, but are we any different?

I have no way of knowing, but I'd guess FoxNews is, at very least, less corrupt.

I was very, very liberal until I noticed that my observation of the Thomas hearings was completely different from what PBS, NPR etc, reported.

Nowdays, I notice that a lot of what I see through C-Span's camera is not what is later reported by the liberal media. FoxNews coverage is closer to what I would report, if I were a reporter.

Of course, if FoxNews generally does the same thing as CNN, they deserve to be exposed, too.

20 posted on 04/15/2003 7:00:30 AM PDT by syriacus (Schumer says a RED flag has been raised on Estrada. Straw man or RED Herring are more correct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson