Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Retrofire
Freaking shiite islamo-fascists. First their representatives boycott the meeting due to the U.S. presence, and then they protest that they're not represented at the meeting. These people are so completely screwed up in the head, it's hard to believe we will ever be able to work with them. Hopefully the rest of the Iraqis that participated have sounder minds and that a bona fide alliance among them can be achieved.
4 posted on 04/15/2003 1:02:10 PM PDT by Camerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Camerican
Shiite for brains!!
7 posted on 04/15/2003 1:09:29 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Camerican
"Freaking shiite islamo-fascists. First their representatives boycott the meeting due to the U.S. presence, and then they protest that they're not represented at the meeting. These people are so completely screwed up in the head, it's hard to believe we will ever be able to work with them. Hopefully the rest of the Iraqis that participated have sounder minds and that a bona fide alliance among them can be achieved."

I wonder how much influence Iran has on that group...
10 posted on 04/15/2003 1:23:25 PM PDT by DeuceTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Camerican
Whoa! Further down in the linked article:

The Iraqi groups represented included Kurds, Summis (sic) and Shiites, and others who have spent years in exile. All were specially invited by the US.

The Shiite faction that boycotted and demonstrated is the Iranian-backed Iraq Islamic Revolutionary Council (IIRC). The more moderate Ayatollah Ali Mohammed Sistani faction attended the meeting. (Sistani issued the Fatwa telling his followers not to impede the U.S. forces in the first week of the war). The potential secular leader of the Sistani faction, Khoi, was assassinated last week by followers of the IIRC.

Hopefully the rest of the Iraqis that participated have sounder minds and that a bona fide alliance among them can be achieved.

Among the "rest of the Iraqis" were the Sunnis. Saddam's Baathist party and Osama Bin Laden are Sunnis, as are most of the corrupt Arab leaders. The Shiites are the Iraqis that were slaughtered after the first Gulf War, and some believe that the historical DOS preference for Sunni dictators (e.g. Saudi Arabia) had a lot to do with our looking the other way.

The situation in Iraq, and the factions involved, couldn't be more complicated; it will take some mighty fancy footwork (and a big stick) to make them cooperate, not to mention some arm wrestling between the DOS and the DOD.

11 posted on 04/15/2003 1:26:14 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Camerican
They were concerned that the leading Shiite organisation in Iraq had boycotted the meeting. The Irani revolutionary government is where these Iraqi Shiite leadership hearts reside. Question is, can the common people in their twisted flock resist the Irani influence and form a representative government that tolerates other religious beliefs? Living under despotism is a hard habit to break away from. It requires self confidence and personal responsibility.
30 posted on 04/15/2003 2:17:20 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson