Skip to comments.
BUSH WRONG ON FIREARMS
Worldnetdaily ^
| April 17, 2003
| By Joseph Farah
Posted on 04/16/2003 10:44:51 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
Edited on 04/17/2003 1:23:31 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: RLK
To: Uncle Bill
No Bill, you're wrong. There is some sort of secret genuis here or maybe this story is just make believe.
....at least that's what folks keep telling me.
3
posted on
04/16/2003 10:55:40 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Hootie to head EEOC...)
To: Uncle Bill
bump
To: Uncle Bill
5
posted on
04/16/2003 10:59:13 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- I don't own any "assault rifles," just Homeland Defense Rifles. It's my patriotic duty. ---)
To: wardaddy
Hehe. It must be that secret all-knowing compassionate strategy, only known by the village people.
To: Travis McGee
LOL. I love that photo everytime I see it. Thanks so much for being so dedicated to the Constitution, the founding fathers, and holding so true to the 2nd Amendment all this time. God bless.
To: Uncle Bill; Travis McGee
Well...he may be a damn good war leader and we all know he's an exponential improvement over his predecessor(and we did crawl thru broken glass for him) but he and the folks he's listening to are simply wrong.
This steady tug away from the conservative base makes no sense to me.
I know that now I'll be admonished and told to give it time .moderate socially and domestically..that next election we will get a supermajority and then things will really click....ok....where have I got to go politically?....nowhere...and Rove knows that....but some folks aren't gonna be pragmatic like me and they might just stay home. It's a gamble that I SEE NO FRIGGIN REASON SUCH A POPULAR PRESIDENT NEEDS TO TAKE....he has beaucoup political capital....
Hell, lets spend some of it dammit!
8
posted on
04/16/2003 11:12:53 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Hootie to head EEOC...)
To: wardaddy
It seems that Presidents are only concerned about their base when they're in serious trouble. When things are rolling and they have 75% approval ratings, complete control of Congress, and are coming off major foreign policy victories, they seem to make a mad grab for the center.
Let's hope Bush is just holding his finger to the wind with this. I'm not willing to crucify him just yet.
9
posted on
04/16/2003 11:17:40 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: wardaddy
Bump
10
posted on
04/16/2003 11:18:41 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: wardaddy
The secret genuis is that this is a minor issue and needs to be fought out in Congress. If the bill doesn`t cross GWB`s desk, it ain`t going to be law. This is a big country with lots of voters that don`t understand all the gun control issues. The Rats would love to have Bush say he is going to overturn the law. We need to help Bush and anti-anti gun grabbers in 04, thats the real prize. Better that this piece by directed to how to move Congress
11
posted on
04/16/2003 11:19:28 PM PDT
by
bybybill
(first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
To: wardaddy
B-E-L-I-V-E ! This presidnt isn't a jerk and methinks that this story is NOT factual.
To: nopardons
Oh dear, leave it to me to louse up a word in bold and caps. BELIEVE is how it should read. :-(
To: bybybill
The Rats would love to have Bush say he is going to overturn the law.Why? Do they want to lose their seats? If Bush overturns the law, he wins in a landslide.
14
posted on
04/16/2003 11:23:05 PM PDT
by
Kenno
To: wardaddy
My guess is the renewal will never make it out of the House in the first place. In fact this may be intended to see to it that it doesn't happen so Bush doesn't have to sign or veto it.
15
posted on
04/16/2003 11:23:15 PM PDT
by
Hugin
To: wardaddy
This steady tug away from the conservative base makes no sense to me.
---------------------------
Conservatives let themselves be conned.
16
posted on
04/16/2003 11:23:19 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: Mr. Mojo
Me neither as I stated...I'm just disappointed.
17
posted on
04/16/2003 11:23:20 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Hootie to head EEOC...)
To: bybybill
Why not just say nothing?
18
posted on
04/16/2003 11:23:57 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Hootie to head EEOC...)
To: Uncle Bill
Uncle Bill is a gutless mouse with no solutions.
19
posted on
04/16/2003 11:26:09 PM PDT
by
diamond6
("Everyone who is for abortion HAS been born." Ronald Reagan)
To: Hugin
Actually, I have a theory on this.
Bush originally endorsed the ban in order to get the support of wealthy "moderate" Republicans in the primaries against John McCain. Now, he doesn't want to make an issue out of it when he's trying to concentrate on getting his tax cuts passed. If he loses on this vote, the economy could go south and screw up his reelection chances. Nevertheless, his ultimate gain comes from opposing the ban, not renewing it.
20
posted on
04/16/2003 11:26:52 PM PDT
by
Kenno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson