Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
You and Daschle are not in the same box. You didn't claim to be a Catholic in order to get Catholic votes. Daschle did. The bishop cannot legally order Daschle to stop using the claim to be Catholic -- not in any way that would hold up in the civil courts. But he can legally order Daschle not to call himself Catholic within the Catholic Church. If Daschle doesn't care about whether or not he is considered Catholic by the Church he claims to belong to, then the bishop's demand just calls attention to Daschle's claiming to be Catholic which is at odds with the Church. It is a heads up to Catholic voters who might be tempted to vote for him because he's Catholic.
439 posted on 04/19/2003 7:46:40 PM PDT by Knither (that theology minor in college comes in handy now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]


To: Knither
I suspect a lot of Lutherans will be cognizant of this, too. Remember that Tommy has to run against his own record when in flyover country, and there are LOTS of Lutherans who take religion seriously. That's two big strikes.

And if South Dakota ACTUALLY implements voter-registration reform, it should be curtains for Deeply Disappointed Tommy.
443 posted on 04/19/2003 9:17:45 PM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson