Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘It's Scott’
ABC News ^ | April 18. 2003 | Mike Gudgell, Steffan Tubbs and Taina Hernandez

Posted on 04/17/2003 10:42:41 PM PDT by tessalu

April 17 — The father of missing pregnant woman Laci Peterson is not waiting for test results on a female torso and male fetus found on a San Francisco Bay-area beach to accuse his daughter's husband of murder.

• Missing Woman's Dad Wants Husband Charged

"It's her husband Scott," Dennis Rocha said in a telephone interview with WBZ-TV in Boston. "He never looked me in the eye. And he never pleaded for her. He just shows no remorse." Authorities are conducting tests to determine whether the torso and fetus found a mile apart on consecutive days are those of Laci Peterson, the 27-year-old Modesto, Calif., woman who disappeared on Christmas Eve, and her unborn son.

As Laci's family waits for the test results to return, her husband's whereabouts remain unclear. Scott Peterson, 30, a fertilizer salesman, hasn't surfaced publicly since the bodies were discovered.

Neighbors in the Modesto community where he and Laci lived have said they have not seen him in about a week. Modesto police previously said they do not know where he is, and now have no comment on his whereabouts.

Scott Peterson's relatives say they don't know where he is either. "What if Scott were here?" Scott's father, Lee Peterson, told reporters Tuesday at his house north of San Diego. "Is that a big deal?"

Scott Peterson told police he last saw Laci on the morning of Dec. 24 before he went fishing out of Berkeley Marina. Modesto police have said Scott is not a suspect in his wife's disappearance. But he has not been ruled out, either, especially by Laci's father. He believes Scott killed his daughter and unborn grandson and wants him charged with murder.

"That's what I want, some justice done here," Rocha told WBZ-TV. "I can't see Scott being out there free. That would just eat me up. It'll [the charges against Scott] happen very soon."

A high-ranking member of the investigation told ABCNEWS' Steffan Tubbs that police have many questions that only Scott Peterson can answer, and that even though the husband has not been labeled a suspect, a detective from the district attorney's office has been working side by side with investigators from the beginning. He is believed to be forming a possible case for prosecution.

DA Believes It’s Laci

Scott Peterson has acknowledged he was having an affair, but maintains he did not hurt his wife. Laci's family initially supported him, but after learning of the affair, they lost trust in him. Dennis Rocha suspects the affair was a motive in what happened to his daughter.

"They seemed like they got along real good," he said of his daughter and son-in-law. "Maybe Laci found out about the girlfriend or something."

Stanislaus County District Attorney James Brazelton told The Modesto Bee he believes the remains are those of Laci Peterson and her child.

"I feel pretty strongly it is [her]," he said."It's too much of a coincidence to have a female and a baby found close to each other a day apart, and no others were reported missing."

Testing Continues

Genetic experts at the California attorney general's office are still working on the first step of determining whether or not they have extracted enough good-quality DNA to begin identification tests. They have determined that the baby's remains will provide sufficient material, and are still assessing the adult, officials said today.

"We've determined that we can yield a usable DNA profile from the fetus sample," said California Department of Justice spokesman Nathan Barankin. "We're doing a little more work on the adult sample to finally determine whether we will be able to get a usable DNA profile."

If officials find they don't have adequate amounts of DNA, they plan to take more samples from the state's coroner's office and repeat the process. If they do have viable samples, they will compare them with hairs from Peterson and cheek swabs from her parents. These comparisons may only take days.

Point Isabel in Richmond is approximately 90 miles away from Modesto, Calif., where Laci Peterson and her husband lived. (ABCNEWS.com)

Police sources told ABCNEWS the amount of decomposition and size of the remains are consistent with the time frame of Peterson's disappearance and her physical description, and that a nursing bra typically worn by women during late-term pregnancy was found on the remains.

There were no head or legs on the torso, and investigators said only a portion of the arms remained, so it was not possible to get fingerprints.

The torso was found Monday about 90 miles from the Petersons' Modesto home, after a dog found a bone on the beach at the Point Isabel Regional Shoreline in Richmond. A full-term, decaying male fetus with the umbilical cord still attached was found Sunday, about a mile away, according to the Contra Costa County coroner.

Laci Peterson was due to give birth on Feb. 10. She and Scott had already named unborn son Connor.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; conner; dontubelievemyalibi; ibefishing; laci; lacipetersen; murder; peterson; scottpetersen; sonkiller; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2003 10:42:41 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tessalu
God help this sad old world.
2 posted on 04/17/2003 10:48:19 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic and Monarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
I just cannot imagine reading this horrific stuff about your daughter and grandson day in and day out.

What these people must be going through is almost too much to ask of humans.
3 posted on 04/17/2003 10:51:05 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Scott Peterson, 30, a fertilizer salesman, hasn't surfaced publicly since the bodies were discovered.

For some reason I'm reminded of the scene in Fargo where pregnant Sheriff Frances McDormand is interrogating perp William H. Macy in his auto sales office, he excuses himself for a moment and then is seen by her tearing out of the parking lot.

"He's fleein' the interview! He's fleein' the interview!" she repeats, incredulous.

4 posted on 04/17/2003 10:51:55 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Hubby had motive, method and opportunity.
5 posted on 04/17/2003 11:48:55 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Any ideas on when he wil be arrested? I say before the end of the summer .... but I surely do not want to wait that long.
6 posted on 04/17/2003 11:50:33 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Hubby had motive, method and opportunity.<P: Well, he placed himself at the scene where the body was discovered. Does anyone really believe that another murderer would go to lengths to frame him? He is just another killer who over estimated his ability to elude the law.
7 posted on 04/17/2003 11:54:04 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Maybe the killer waited for the bodies to be found and then killed Scott and hid his body so that Scott would get the blame.
8 posted on 04/18/2003 12:01:27 AM PDT by Consort (Use only un-hyphenated words when posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Since when did it cease to be libelous to make such statements about someone in the absence of a verdict confirming their guilt.

I mean, it looks like what it looks like but if he is not convicted, charged or is otherwise found innocent, does he have a cause of action against the brother in law or anyone else that says he did it?

I'm sure someone can help out on this questions.

9 posted on 04/18/2003 12:14:07 AM PDT by MissBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Maybe the killer waited for the bodies to be found and then killed Scott and hid his body so that Scott would get the blame.

I hadn't thought of that. I suppose if the killer made it look like a suicide ...

10 posted on 04/18/2003 12:17:53 AM PDT by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
If Scott chooses to do so, hey may sue for slander.

The problem is, he's staring down the barrell of a criminal (capital, I believe) indictment.

Also, he'd undoubtedly have to submit to a deposition, which could get really ugly...for Scott.

Furthermore, what attorney would agree to try the case with what's known about this case--not to mention what we may find out soon?
11 posted on 04/18/2003 12:23:30 AM PDT by jra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jra
I appreciate the points you raise. I was referring to a little farther down the line, perhaps even after a trial that would have found him innocent. Then could he, or anyone for that matter in a similar situation, go back on the statements that have been made about him and sue for libel or slander?

It is the same thing with OJ (not that I like the guy). He was not convicted yet many people say things about him like he was. Technically, at least as I understand slander/libel law, he would have a case. In OJ's case, people continue to say he is a murderer. The jury said he is not. Is that slander?

(Please, don't anyone go off that I am defending Scott whats his name or OJ. The question is on Slander/libel against someone tried and convicted in public but not in the courts. Thanks.)
12 posted on 04/18/2003 12:55:04 AM PDT by MissBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Gee, do ya think?
13 posted on 04/18/2003 12:56:03 AM PDT by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Scott Peterson, 30, a fertilizer salesman, hasn't surfaced publicly since the bodies were discovered.

Isn't his profession rather ironic? He's been pushing fertilizer with his story since day one...

14 posted on 04/18/2003 12:59:10 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (* * Common Sense is an Oxymoron * *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
I was thinking the same thing. He's been selling the public a load of **it since day one. He definitely picked the appropriate profession for his personality.
15 posted on 04/18/2003 1:16:12 AM PDT by LoveBushLongTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LoveBushLongTime
I can understand the father's feelings, for I can not stand to see someone running around, who has left Laci and her baby in such a condition that no one is willing to describe it. That is just how horrible it is.
16 posted on 04/18/2003 1:31:29 AM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Consort
Maybe the killer waited for the bodies to be found and then killed Scott and hid his body so that Scott would get the blame.

LOL. Maybe OJ did it.

18 posted on 04/18/2003 8:05:45 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Moot point: If it's true, it can't be libelous. (Oops, add me to the list!)
19 posted on 04/18/2003 8:09:15 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Being graphic here...

Has anyone raised theories about why the baby is out of the mother's body?? To me this begs the possibility that Laci wasn't killed until she gave birth. Perhaps the baby floated away from the mother's decomposing body, but...

Although I find Scott's behavior really odd, all of the publicity about where he was fishing... the exact location, etc. could certainly have tipped off a kidnapper. Obviously, if Laci was being held captive and later killed, a smart kidnapper would dump her at the exact place where Scott placed himself through the marina receipt.

If he really did kill her, dump her, and place himself at that location, he is so stupid it's unbelievable. Of course, we're not talking about a rational person anyway who would kill his wife and unborn child.
20 posted on 04/18/2003 8:17:43 AM PDT by BamaDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson