Replies

"Jordan exposed something that opened him and CNN up to all kinds of objections and ridicule,"

I heard Jordan interviewed on either CSPAN or ABC radio (the funny thing is that it really doesn't matter which, both being such tools of the sadam lovers). He really impressed me with his craven spinelessness when he attempted to defend himself. Deep in his shriveled up soul, he is an appeaser, pure and simple. He believes that silence is an appropriate response to evil, in the hope that things will not get worse, and he places himself and a few potential victims he does know above millions of defenseless victims he does not know. He does not understand anything about looking evil square in the face and, with god's grace and blessing, fighting it. The concept is compeletely foreign to his makeup. I am convinced that in making a public statement he was not seeking forgiveness with the invocation to go and sin no more. He was simply hoping to wash the slate clean of the now too obvious sins that CNN had committed and sin a lot more. He is not slightly better than the other journalists. He is two degrees worse, if that is possible.

" He really impressed me with his craven spinelessness when he attempted to defend himself. Deep in his shriveled up soul, he is an appeaser, pure and simple. He believes that silence is an appropriate response to evil, in the hope that things will not get worse, and he places himself and a few potential victims he does know above millions of defenseless victims he does not know."

Bravo, bravo, well said. The shriveled up soul of appeasers is rooted in the acceptance of evil as an appropiate response to evil. The French and many other nations and American liberals do the same; much to the detriment of our hard won constitutional liberties.
They bend their knee to Satan, the father of lies.