I must interrupt that train of thought, I was about to violate FreeRepublic terms of service.
God help them all: the Roches, the Petersons, the investigators. What a sick sick act.
Let's see. Which is worse, killing 2 people or 35+?
Not by an order of magnitude. If guilty, he's a slug, no doubt about it. He is not, however, a sociopath, bent on multiple murders of strangers. If he's guilty he's just your average domestic abuse thug. Manson, Dahmer, Bundy each plotted and carried out the deaths of many whom they didn't know.
Manson even inspired his followers to target the children of execs of paper companies (they were Al Gore type eco freaks), to do to them what the paper companies did to trees (cut off limbs, remove skin, etc.). I know. I got that threat, by name, from them as a teenager. One of his lovelies served 15 years for that stunt.
You don't, but others are quick to jump to conclusions. It sure looks like he's guilty, but that's based on the well researched and always reliable tripe coming out of the American media "ministry of truth." If he didn't do it, but some sick serial killer did, where do you think he'd drop the bodies off, after all the publicity about that part of the bay? Remember Richard Jewel and the Olympic bombing.
To misquote Mr. Franklin, our judicial system is the worst there is, except for all the others.