Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Eagle
He didn't go into the building, he just broke the glass door to let the dog out, so there was no possibility of the firefighters having to go in an rescue him. There was a link to the video on an earlier thread. If the firefighters didn't have enough manpower to go over and break the door themselves, they should be glad the guy took care of it himself.

And think about this: Lawson was asked what fire officials would have done if Martin had run to save his child from a burning building. ''That would be something that would be a split-second decision depending on the circumstances,'' she said. Lawson said it's the Fire Department's responsibility, not that of citizens, to rescue animals and people from burning buildings. ''We don't draw lines. We are here for lives, period. If any situation proves safe, we would go in for a child, a dog, a pet, when the situation was safe enough.

The position of this fire department is that if you see your CHILD stuck behind a glass door or window in a burning building, the (government) firefighters have the right to prevent you from going to break the door/window to save your child, if THEY think it's not "safe enough".

37 posted on 04/18/2003 8:45:23 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
If any situation proves safe, we would go in for a child, a dog, a pet, when the situation was safe enough.

Can you imagine if that attitude prevailed in the military??? "If any situation proves safe, we would go take Baghdad, Tikrit, Mosul, when the situation was safe enough."

121 posted on 04/18/2003 10:30:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (There be no shelter here; the front line is everywhere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson